Cheng Jonathan H, Hoofnagle Andrew N, Katz Ronit, Kritchevsky Stephen B, Shlipak Michael G, Sarnak Mark J, Ix Joachim H, Ginsberg Charles
Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, United States.
Nephrology Section, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, United States.
JBMR Plus. 2025 Jan 14;9(3):ziaf001. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf001. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Vitamin D deficiency is common across the world. However, the standard clinical biomarker for vitamin D, 25OHD, may be a poor marker of vitamin D status, as most of circulating vitamin D is protein bound and not bioavailable. Free (unbound) vitamin D may therefore be a better marker of vitamin D status. We evaluated the relationship of free vitamin D with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), heart failure (HF), kidney function decline (KFD) and fracture, among 786 participants in the Health Aging and body composition study. We used sequential models to assess hazard ratios (HRs) of each outcome that adjusted for age, sex, race, season of blood sampling, and study site, kidney function, serum calcium and phosphate, FGF 23, PTH, BMI, and vitamin D supplementation. The mean age of the 786 participants was 75 ± 3 yr, 53% were women, and 40% were Black. The median free vitamin D concentration was 5.3 (interquartile range 4.1-6.7) pg/mL. There were 157 cases of incident CVD, 123 cases of incident HF, 382 cases of incident KFD, and 178 fractures over 11 yr of follow-up. In fully adjusted models, a 2-fold greater free vitamin D was associated with lower risk of incident HF [HR 0.75, 95%CI,0.58-0.96 ] and greater risk KFD [1.25(1.03-1.52)]. We found no association between free vitamin D and incident CVD or fracture. We did not find evidence that free vitamin D was a superior marker of clinical outcomes compared to total 25OHD alone. Further studies are needed to elucidate the relationship of free vitamin D with clinical outcomes.
维生素D缺乏在全球范围内都很常见。然而,维生素D的标准临床生物标志物25OHD可能并不是维生素D状态的良好指标,因为大多数循环中的维生素D都与蛋白质结合,无法发挥生物活性。因此,游离(未结合)维生素D可能是更好的维生素D状态指标。我们在健康老龄化与身体成分研究的786名参与者中,评估了游离维生素D与心血管疾病(CVD)、心力衰竭(HF)、肾功能下降(KFD)和骨折之间的关系。我们使用序贯模型来评估每个结局的风险比(HRs),这些模型对年龄、性别、种族、采血季节、研究地点、肾功能、血清钙和磷、FGF 23、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)、体重指数(BMI)和维生素D补充剂进行了校正。786名参与者的平均年龄为75±3岁,53%为女性,40%为黑人。游离维生素D浓度的中位数为5.3(四分位间距4.1 - 6.7)pg/mL。在11年的随访中,有157例新发CVD、123例新发HF、382例新发KFD和178例骨折。在完全校正的模型中,游离维生素D增加2倍与新发HF风险降低相关[HR 0.75,95%CI,0.58 - 0.96],与KFD风险增加相关[1.25(1.03 - 1.52)]。我们发现游离维生素D与新发CVD或骨折之间没有关联。我们没有发现证据表明与单独的总25OHD相比,游离维生素D是临床结局的更好指标。需要进一步研究来阐明游离维生素D与临床结局之间的关系。