Zhong Suixing, Yi Junzhe, Chen Song, Mo Xiaoyan, Chen Qifeng, Guo Wenbo, Jiang Xiongying, Mu Luwen, Hu Yue, Wang Jiongliang, Song Yujia, Xu Jie, Tan Genjun, Shi Ming, Chen Minshan, Lyu Ning, Zhao Ming
Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Liver Cancer Study and Service Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Hepatol Int. 2025 Feb 11. doi: 10.1007/s12072-025-10777-8.
Hepatocellular carcinoma with inferior vena cava and/or right atrium tumor thrombus (HCC-IVC/RATT) has a poor prognosis and lacks evidence for standard first-line systemic therapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of three therapeutic regimens in HCC-IVC/RATT: immune checkpoint inhibitors plus molecular-targeted agents (ICI-MTA), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and their combination (ICI-MTA-HAIC).
This multicenter retrospective cohort study included consecutive HCC-IVC/RATT who received ICI-MTA-HAIC, ICI-MTA, or HAIC from June 2015 to December 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics.
A total of 355 patients were included: 209 received ICI-MTA-HAIC, 66 received ICI-MTA, and 80 received HAIC. After PSM, the ICI-MTA-HAIC group showed superior median overall survival (OS) to both the ICI-MTA (18.0 vs. 7.5 months, p < 0.001) and HAIC (18.5 vs. 7.1 months, p < 0.001) groups. The ICI-MTA-HAIC group demonstrated better median progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared to the ICI-MTA (PFS: 9.5 vs. 4.4 months; ORR: 47.0% vs. 21.3%, all p < 0.001) and HAIC (PFS: 9.5 vs. 4.4 months; ORR: 48.8% vs. 21.6%, all p < 0.001) groups. There was no significant difference in OS, PFS, or ORR between the ICI-MTA and HAIC groups (all p > 0.05). Grade 3-4 adverse event rates were 49.8%, 33.3%, and 35.0% for the ICI-MTA-HAIC, ICI-MTA, and HAIC groups, respectively. No unexpected events or treatment-related deaths were observed.
ICI-MTA-HAIC was a safe and effective therapy that prolonged the survival of HCC-IVC/RATT compared to ICI-MTA or HAIC.
伴有下腔静脉和/或右心房瘤栓的肝细胞癌(HCC-IVC/RATT)预后较差,且缺乏标准一线全身治疗的证据。本研究旨在评估三种治疗方案对HCC-IVC/RATT的有效性和安全性:免疫检查点抑制剂联合分子靶向药物(ICI-MTA)、肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)及其联合方案(ICI-MTA-HAIC)。
这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年6月至2023年12月期间连续接受ICI-MTA-HAIC、ICI-MTA或HAIC治疗的HCC-IVC/RATT患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡基线特征。
共纳入355例患者:209例接受ICI-MTA-HAIC治疗,66例接受ICI-MTA治疗,80例接受HAIC治疗。PSM后,ICI-MTA-HAIC组的中位总生存期(OS)优于ICI-MTA组(18.0个月对7.5个月,p<0.001)和HAIC组(18.5个月对7.1个月,p<0.001)。与ICI-MTA组(无进展生存期:9.5个月对4.4个月;客观缓解率:47.0%对21.3%,均p<0.001)和HAIC组(无进展生存期:9.5个月对4.4个月;客观缓解率:48.8%对21.6%,均p<0.001)相比,ICI-MTA-HAIC组表现出更好的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。ICI-MTA组和HAIC组之间的OS、PFS或ORR无显著差异(均p>0.05)。ICI-MTA-HAIC组、ICI-MTA组和HAIC组的3-4级不良事件发生率分别为49.8%、33.3%和35.0%。未观察到意外事件或与治疗相关的死亡。
与ICI-MTA或HAIC相比,ICI-MTA-HAIC是一种安全有效的治疗方法,可延长HCC-IVC/RATT患者的生存期。