Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1168. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12940-0.
Tri-combination therapy based on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of infusion fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-HAIC) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have been proven effective. However, whether it was best for these HCC patients to start with the most potent therapeutic pattern was still under debate. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC combined with systemic therapies in the patterns of sequential and concurrent schedules.
This real-world study included 117 unresectable HCC patients who initially received either FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy (HAIC group, n = 44) or concurrent ICIs and TKIs (ConHAIC group, n = 73) from March 2020 and June 2022, during the period of FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy in HAIC group, patients in the HAIC group (n = 30) experienced progressive disease (PD) would have their treatment pattern converted from the FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy to the combination of FOLFOX-HAIC plus ICIs and TKIs sequentially (SeqHAIC group). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, were compared between patients in the SeqHAIC and ConHAIC groups.
The median follow-up time of the SeqHAIC group was 24.92 months (95% CI, 12.74-37.09 months) and of the ConHAIC group was 17.87 months (95% CI, 16.85-18.89 months) and no significant difference was observed in both PFS (HR, 1.572; 95% CI, 0.848-2.916; p = 0.151) and OS (HR, 1.212; 95% CI, 0.574-2.561; p = 0.614) between the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups. As for the tumor responses, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding tumor responses, overall response rates (p = 0.658) and disease control rates (p = 0.641) were 50.0%, 45.2%, and 83.3%, 89.0% for the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups, respectively.
Our study revealed that sequential systemic ICIs and TKIs in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC provides similar long-term prognosis and better tolerability compared to concurrent therapy for locally advanced HCC patients. Prospective studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to validate these findings.
基于肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)输注氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX-HAIC)联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的三联疗法已被证明对局部晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者有效。然而,对于这些 HCC 患者来说,从最有效的治疗模式开始是否最佳仍存在争议。本回顾性研究评估了 FOLFOX-HAIC 联合系统治疗在序贯和同时两种方案中的疗效和安全性。
本真实世界研究纳入了 117 例无法切除的 HCC 患者,他们最初分别接受 FOLFOX-HAIC 单药治疗(HAIC 组,n=44)或同时接受 ICI 和 TKI 治疗(ConHAIC 组,n=73)。在 HAIC 组接受 FOLFOX-HAIC 单药治疗期间,HAIC 组中有 30 例患者出现疾病进展(PD),他们的治疗模式将从 FOLFOX-HAIC 单药治疗转换为 FOLFOX-HAIC 联合 ICI 和 TKI 的序贯治疗(SeqHAIC 组)。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)作为主要结局,在 SeqHAIC 组和 ConHAIC 组之间进行比较。
SeqHAIC 组的中位随访时间为 24.92 个月(95%CI,12.74-37.09 个月),ConHAIC 组为 17.87 个月(95%CI,16.85-18.89 个月),两组 PFS(HR,1.572;95%CI,0.848-2.916;p=0.151)和 OS(HR,1.212;95%CI,0.574-2.561;p=0.614)无显著差异。在肿瘤反应方面,两组之间的肿瘤反应、总缓解率(p=0.658)和疾病控制率(p=0.641)均无显著差异,SeqHAIC 组和 ConHAIC 组分别为 50.0%、45.2%和 83.3%、89.0%。
本研究表明,对于局部晚期 HCC 患者,序贯全身 ICI 和 TKI 联合 FOLFOX-HAIC 与同时治疗相比,提供了相似的长期预后和更好的耐受性。需要更大样本量和更长随访时间的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。