Lima Junior Ivo Aurelio, Machado Cristiani Vieira, Lima Sheyla Maria Lemos
Universidade Federal do Ceará, Sobral, Brasil.
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Feb 7;40(12):e00023524. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT023524. eCollection 2025.
This article analyzes the performance of the Brazilian National Regulatory for Private Health Insurance and Plans Agency (ANS, acronym in Portuguese) in the regulation of care in the sector from 2000 to 2018. After documentary analysis, the main initiatives of the regulatory dimension were characterized in the five terms of the agency's board of directors in the period. Furthermore, the study explores the legal and infra-legal norms related to the theme and the ANS main actions to guarantee coverage and qualification of the assistance offered by operators and service providers. These regulations were organized into three axes of care regulation: list of procedures and events in healthcare and care coverage; care segmentation; and Initiatives for health promotion, disease prevention, and qualification of care. We observed that the measures of care regulation implemented followed a continuity trend, despite the variation in political orientations and professional trajectories of their CEOs or the configuration of the collegiate board. This can be attributed to factors such as the professionalization of the regulation and the establishment of ANS institutional framework. Despite the micro-regulatory nature of the agency's performance, care regulation contributed to the promotion of comprehensive care for health plan beneficiaries and to the induction of better care practices by operators and their service providers. However, companies stakeholders still pressure public managers, aiming at making care regulation more flexible.
本文分析了巴西国家私人健康保险和计划监管局(葡萄牙语首字母缩写为ANS)在2000年至2018年期间对该部门护理监管的表现。经过文献分析,该监管层面的主要举措在该时期该机构董事会的五个任期内得到了描述。此外,该研究探讨了与该主题相关的法律和超法律规范,以及ANS为保证运营商和服务提供商所提供援助的覆盖范围和质量而采取的主要行动。这些规定被组织成护理监管的三个轴:医疗保健中的程序和事件清单以及护理覆盖范围;护理细分;以及健康促进、疾病预防和护理质量提升举措。我们观察到,尽管该机构首席执行官的政治倾向和职业轨迹有所不同,或者合议董事会的构成有所变化,但实施的护理监管措施仍呈现出连续性趋势。这可归因于监管专业化和ANS制度框架建立等因素。尽管该机构的表现具有微观监管性质,但护理监管有助于促进为健康计划受益人提供全面护理,并促使运营商及其服务提供商采用更好的护理做法。然而,企业利益相关者仍向公共管理人员施压,旨在使护理监管更加灵活。