• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效

Comparing Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

作者信息

Tu Chen-Chen, Mao Hanqi Kelly, Wessol Jennifer L

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 2025 Jun 1;57(3):127-131. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000821. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000821
PMID:39937592
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and disability. Patients who receive thrombolytic therapy promptly tend to have better outcomes. Although alteplase (tPA) is the standard Food and Drug Administration-approved thrombolytic for AIS treatment, recent American Heart Association guidelines suggest that tenecteplase (TNK) can be used as an alternative. This project compares the cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes of TNK versus tPA in AIS treatment. Key outcomes include door-to-needle time, length of stay, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, and the incidence of hemorrhagic conversion events. METHODS: The project involved retrospective analysis through medical chart reviews at a thrombectomy-capable stroke center in a Pacific Northwest community hospital. Data were collected from 175 AIS patients treated with either tPA (82) or TNK (93) between March 2022 and December 2023. Patients eligible for thrombolytic therapy received tPA before March 15, 2023, with TNK used thereafter. Selection criteria adhered to American Heart Association guidelines and clinicians' judgment. RESULTS: Although door-to-needle times were similar ( P = .20), excluding outliers revealed a significant difference favoring TNK ( P = .04). No significant group differences were observed for demographics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, length of stay, or post-intracerebral hemorrhage rates. Tenecteplase use resulted in over $40 000 in medication savings during the project period. CONCLUSION: Tenecteplase offers comparable safety and efficacy to tPA for treating AIS, with the added benefit of cost savings. Although clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between the 2 drugs, TNK's reduced cost and ease of administration make it an attractive option, particularly in resource-limited settings. These results support the current organizational treatment protocol favoring TNK.

摘要

背景

急性缺血性卒中(AIS)是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。及时接受溶栓治疗的患者往往预后更好。尽管阿替普酶(tPA)是美国食品药品监督管理局批准的用于AIS治疗的标准溶栓药物,但美国心脏协会最近的指南表明,替奈普酶(TNK)可用作替代药物。本项目比较了TNK与tPA在AIS治疗中的成本效益和临床结局。主要结局包括门到针时间、住院时间、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分以及出血转化事件的发生率。

方法

该项目通过对太平洋西北部一家社区医院的具备血栓切除术能力的卒中中心的病历进行回顾性分析。收集了2022年3月至2023年12月期间接受tPA(82例)或TNK(93例)治疗的175例AIS患者的数据。有资格接受溶栓治疗的患者在2023年3月15日前接受tPA治疗,此后使用TNK。选择标准遵循美国心脏协会指南和临床医生的判断。

结果

尽管门到针时间相似(P = 0.20),但排除异常值后显示TNK具有显著优势(P = 0.04)。在人口统计学、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、住院时间或脑出血后发生率方面未观察到显著的组间差异。在项目期间,使用替奈普酶节省了超过4万美元的药物费用。

结论

替奈普酶在治疗AIS方面与tPA具有相当的安全性和有效性,并且具有节省成本的额外优势。尽管两种药物的临床结局没有显著差异,但TNK成本降低且给药方便,使其成为一个有吸引力的选择,特别是在资源有限的环境中。这些结果支持了当前倾向于使用TNK的组织治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Comparing Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke.比较替奈普酶和阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效
J Neurosci Nurs. 2025 Jun 1;57(3):127-131. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000821. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Optimizing Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes: The Role of Tenecteplase Before Mechanical Thrombectomy.优化急性缺血性脑卒中结局:机械取栓前替奈普酶的作用。
Clin Ther. 2024 Nov;46(11):e10-e20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
3
Emergency Department Workflow Times of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.急性缺血性卒中中替奈普酶与阿替普酶静脉溶栓的急诊科工作流程时间:COVID-19大流行之前及期间的一项前瞻性队列研究
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2025;15(1):102-109. doi: 10.1159/000543900. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Efficacy and safety outcomes of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:9 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Mar 15;458:122912. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122912. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
5
Tenecteplase versus alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy: experience from a US healthcare system undergoing a system-wide transition of primary thrombolytic.机械取栓术前替奈普酶与阿替普酶的比较:来自美国一个正在进行全系统初级溶栓药物转换的医疗系统的经验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(e2):e277-e281. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019662. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Safety, Functional Disability, Healthcare Utilization, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Elderly Receiving Alteplase and Tenecteplase: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial.接受阿替普酶和替奈普酶治疗的老年人的安全性、功能残疾、医疗保健利用及生活质量结果:来自AcT试验的二次分析
Stroke. 2025 May;56(5):1169-1179. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049512. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
7
Door to needle time trends after transition to tenecteplase: A Multicenter Texas stroke registry.替奈普酶转换后门到针时间趋势:德克萨斯州多中心卒中登记研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Aug;33(8):107774. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107774. Epub 2024 May 23.
8
Number needed to treat with intravenous tenecteplase to reduce the need for mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke patients: A retrospective look at real-world experience data.经静脉注射替奈普酶治疗以减少大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓需求的人数:对真实世界经验数据的回顾性观察。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Aug;126:143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
9
Evaluation of Door-to-Needle Times Between Alteplase and Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke at Two Academic Medical Centers.两家学术医疗中心对急性缺血性卒中患者使用阿替普酶和替奈普酶的门到针时间评估
Ann Pharmacother. 2025 Jun;59(6):538-548. doi: 10.1177/10600280241300230. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
10
Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis From the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial.与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中患者时溶栓时间对临床结局的影响:来自AcT随机对照试验的分析
Stroke. 2023 Nov;54(11):2766-2775. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044267. Epub 2023 Oct 6.