Yang Juxiang, Wang Yi, Zheng Xi, Wang Hongchu, Song Gang
Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Department of Physical Education, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2025 Feb 11:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100046.
Urban-rural differences in depression are evident among older adults in China but not in the United States. By comparing the two countries, this study aims to explore strategies for promoting regional equality in depression in China.
Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were utilized. Longitudinal data were used to describe urban-rural differences in depression prevalence among older adults in China (2011-2020) and the United States (2010-2020). Cross-sectional data from 2018 (CHARLS: 9840 participants; HRS: 10,381 participants) were used to identify key modifiable factors. A random forest algorithm was employed to determine the most important factors influencing depression, and comparisons between the two countries were made to identify modifiable factors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between these key modifiable factors and depression. A mediation model was applied to assess the mediating role of key modifiable factors in the relationship between residence and depression.
Urban-rural differences in physical health status (ADLs, IADLs, and self-reported health) among older adults in China are associated with Urban-Rural Differences in depression. The absence of such inequalities in the U.S. may offer insights for developing policies to promote regional equality in depression among older adults in China.
中国老年人中存在明显的城乡抑郁差异,而美国则不然。通过比较两国情况,本研究旨在探索促进中国抑郁症区域平等的策略。
使用了中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)和健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据。纵向数据用于描述中国(2011 - 2020年)和美国(2010 - 2020年)老年人抑郁症患病率的城乡差异。来自2018年的横断面数据(CHARLS:9840名参与者;HRS:10381名参与者)用于确定关键的可改变因素。采用随机森林算法确定影响抑郁症的最重要因素,并对两国进行比较以确定可改变因素。多元逻辑回归用于分析这些关键可改变因素与抑郁症之间的关系。应用中介模型评估关键可改变因素在居住与抑郁症关系中的中介作用。
1)2011年至2020年期间,中国老年人抑郁症患病率存在城乡差异,而美国没有。2)在中国和美国,按重要性排名的前五个因素都是日常生活活动能力障碍(ADL)、工具性日常生活活动能力障碍(IADL)、疼痛程度、自我报告健康状况(SRH)和年龄。然而,ADL、IADL和SRH的城乡差异在中国存在,在美国则不存在。3)在中国老年人中,ADL、IADL和SRH共同介导了居住与抑郁得分之间关系的31.6%(95%CI:0.268 - 0.360)。
中国老年人身体健康状况(ADL、IADL和自我报告健康)的城乡差异与抑郁症的城乡差异相关。美国不存在此类不平等现象,这可能为制定促进中国老年人抑郁症区域平等的政策提供启示。