Pham Vincent, Ghannam Tahar, Varenne Olivier, Cariou Alain, Dumas Florence, Mafi Donia, Picard Fabien
Department of Cardiology, Cochin Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaire Paris Centre, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre (PARCC), Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris-Cité, 75006 Paris, France.
Department of Cardiology, Cochin Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaire Paris Centre, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Mar;118(3):161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2024.12.011. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
Patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have a poor prognosis, with high death rates. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to predict survival in all-comers with OHCA. Acute coronary syndromes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are the primary causes of OHCA. Recently, a specific prognostic score (Tran risk model) was developed for patients with STEMI-related OHCA.
To compare the accuracy of established non-STEMI-specific prognostic scores (OHCA, modified CAHP and NULL-PLEASE) with the Tran risk model in predicting in-hospital death among patients with STEMI-related OHCA.
This was an observational single-centre study including 315 consecutive patients treated for STEMI-related OHCA. The OHCA score was calculated for 310 patients (98.4%), the NULL-PLEASE and modified CAHP (mCAHP) scores were calculated for 308 patients (97.8%) and the Tran risk model score was calculated for 306 patients (97.1%). A C-statistic analysis was performed to determine score performance.
The area under the curve (AUC) for the Tran risk model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.79). The AUCs for the OHCA, mCAHP and NULL-PLEASE scores were 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.80), 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.80) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.82), respectively. There was no significant difference in AUCs between the Tran risk model and the mCAHP score (P=0.95), the NULL-PLEASE score (P=0.42) or the OHCA score (P=0.93). Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the mCAHP, NULL-PLEASE and OHCA scores. Predictors of death were no-flow duration, diabetes, blood lactate, femoral access and age>75 years.
The OHCA, NULL-PLEASE and mCAHP scores and the Tran risk model showed moderate to good performance in predicting in-hospital death in patients with STEMI-related OHCA. No differences in accuracy were found between non-STEMI-specific scores and the Tran risk model developed for patients with STEMI-related OHCA.
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)复苏后的患者预后较差,死亡率较高。已经开发了多种评分系统来预测OHCA所有患者的生存情况。急性冠状动脉综合征和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)是OHCA的主要原因。最近,针对STEMI相关OHCA患者开发了一种特定的预后评分(Tran风险模型)。
比较已建立的非STEMI特异性预后评分(OHCA、改良CAHP和NULL-PLEASE)与Tran风险模型在预测STEMI相关OHCA患者院内死亡方面的准确性。
这是一项单中心观察性研究,纳入了315例连续接受STEMI相关OHCA治疗的患者。为310例患者(98.4%)计算了OHCA评分,为308例患者(97.8%)计算了NULL-PLEASE和改良CAHP(mCAHP)评分,为306例患者(97.1%)计算了Tran风险模型评分。进行C统计分析以确定评分性能。
Tran风险模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.75(95%置信区间[CI]0.69-0.79)。OHCA、mCAHP和NULL-PLEASE评分的AUC分别为0.74(95%CI0.69-0.80)、0.74(95%CI0.69-0.80)和0.76(95%CI0.71-0.82)。Tran风险模型与mCAHP评分(P=0.95)、NULL-PLEASE评分(P=0.42)或OHCA评分(P=0.93)之间的AUC无显著差异。同样,mCAHP、NULL-PLEASE和OHCA评分之间也未观察到显著差异。死亡的预测因素为无血流持续时间、糖尿病、血乳酸、股动脉穿刺和年龄>75岁。
OHCA、NULL-PLEASE和mCAHP评分以及Tran风险模型在预测STEMI相关OHCA患者院内死亡方面表现为中等至良好。在非STEMI特异性评分与为STEMI相关OHCA患者开发的Tran风险模型之间未发现准确性差异。