Karki Saurab, Lakra Pallavi, Kumar Kaushik, Rao Shiavax J
Internal Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA.
Internal Medicine, Hartford HealthCare Medical Group, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 30;14(3):917. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030917.
Most patients with heart failure exhibit ventricular dyssynchrony, which is addressed by cardiac resynchronization therapy, traditionally through the use of biventricular pacing (BVP) devices. Despite this, around 30% of patients do not achieve the desired clinical outcome, and echocardiographic findings show that some patients deteriorate even further. Conduction system pacing (CSP) is a more physiologic pacing technique and includes his-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). In this review, we further discuss and compare various CSP techniques for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. After analyzing the current state of the literature on this topic until 2023, eight studies were included in this review and consisted of two trials and five observational studies with a total of 2841 patients. Both BVP and CSP resulted in improved outcomes in terms of NYHA class, QRS duration, and left ventricular ejection fraction over time. These effects were more pronounced in patients undergoing CSP, as the technique is more physiological and results in the synchronized activation of the ventricles. LBBAP yielded better outcomes compared to BVP and resulted in fewer heart failure hospitalizations and a lower all-cause mortality rate.
大多数心力衰竭患者存在心室不同步,传统上通过双心室起搏(BVP)装置进行心脏再同步治疗来解决这一问题。尽管如此,仍有大约30%的患者未达到预期的临床效果,超声心动图结果显示,一些患者的病情甚至进一步恶化。传导系统起搏(CSP)是一种更符合生理的起搏技术,包括希氏束起搏(HBP)和左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)。在本综述中,我们进一步讨论并比较了各种用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗的CSP技术。在分析截至2023年关于该主题的文献现状后,本综述纳入了八项研究,包括两项试验和五项观察性研究,共2841例患者。随着时间的推移,BVP和CSP在纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、QRS波时限和左心室射血分数方面均使结局得到改善。这些效果在接受CSP的患者中更为明显,因为该技术更符合生理,可导致心室同步激活。与BVP相比,LBBAP产生了更好的结局,心力衰竭住院次数更少,全因死亡率更低。