Antonuzzo Andrea, Gonella Silvia, Blasi Livio, Carnio Simona, Franzese Ciro, Marano Luigi, Santini Daniele, Bossi Paolo
Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico di Cristina Benfratelli (PA), 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;13(3):212. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030212.
Cancer pain is prevalent across all stages of the disease, significantly impacting patients' lives. Despite the availability of guidelines, its assessment and management remain suboptimal in many clinical settings. This study aimed to explore how healthcare professionals in Italy assess and manage cancer pain, identifying gaps and educational needs to improve adherence to best practices. A multidisciplinary Scientific Board designed an online survey comprising 28 items addressing demographics, pain assessment tools, perception of pain, pharmacological management, adverse effects, and barriers to care. The survey targeted oncologists, nurses, radiotherapists, and surgeons within the Italian Network of Supportive Care in Oncology. Data were collected from March to May 2024 and analyzed descriptively. Eighty-five professionals participated, predominantly oncologists (63.5%). Most respondents utilized pain scales, with the Numerical Rating Scale (60.3%) being the most frequent. However, specific tools like the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were underutilized, possibly due to limited training and time constraints. Factors influencing analgesic choice included patient comorbidities (30.3%) and polypharmacy (28.0%). The main barriers to effective pain management included inadequate training (85.5%) and poor communication between patients and caregivers (40.6%) and within care teams (31.9%). Preventive measures for opioid-induced adverse events were widely employed, with laxatives (52.7%) and antiemetics (40.5%) being the most common. Findings underscore the need for structured training programs, improved communication, and integration of validated assessment tools. A multidisciplinary, proactive approach to cancer pain assessment and management is essential to optimize care and reduce its burden across all disease stages.
癌症疼痛在疾病的各个阶段都很普遍,对患者的生活产生重大影响。尽管有相关指南,但在许多临床环境中,其评估和管理仍未达到最佳状态。本研究旨在探讨意大利的医疗保健专业人员如何评估和管理癌症疼痛,找出差距和教育需求,以提高对最佳实践的依从性。一个多学科科学委员会设计了一项在线调查,包括28个项目,涉及人口统计学、疼痛评估工具、疼痛感知、药物管理、不良反应和护理障碍。该调查针对意大利肿瘤支持护理网络中的肿瘤学家、护士、放射治疗师和外科医生。数据于2024年3月至5月收集,并进行描述性分析。85名专业人员参与了调查,其中大多数是肿瘤学家(63.5%)。大多数受访者使用疼痛量表,数字评分量表(60.3%)是最常用的。然而,像埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)这样的特定工具使用不足,可能是由于培训有限和时间限制。影响镇痛药物选择的因素包括患者合并症(30.3%)和多种药物联合使用(28.0%)。有效疼痛管理的主要障碍包括培训不足(85.5%)、患者与护理人员之间(40.6%)以及护理团队内部(31.9%)沟通不畅。阿片类药物引起的不良事件的预防措施被广泛采用,泻药(52.7%)和止吐药(40.5%)是最常见的。研究结果强调了结构化培训计划、改善沟通以及整合经过验证的评估工具的必要性。采取多学科、积极主动的方法进行癌症疼痛评估和管理对于优化护理以及减轻所有疾病阶段的负担至关重要。