• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于林业应用的激光雷达点云中基于改进圆柱体的树干检测

Improved Cylinder-Based Tree Trunk Detection in LiDAR Point Clouds for Forestry Applications.

作者信息

Ma Shaobo, Chen Yongkang, Li Zhefan, Chen Junlin, Zhong Xiaolan

机构信息

College of Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;25(3):714. doi: 10.3390/s25030714.

DOI:10.3390/s25030714
PMID:39943352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11820748/
Abstract

The application of LiDAR technology in extracting individual trees and stand parameters plays a crucial role in forest surveys. Accurate identification of individual tree trunks is a critical foundation for subsequent parameter extraction. For LiDAR-acquired forest point cloud data, existing two-dimensional (2D) plane-based algorithms for tree trunk detection often suffer from spatial information loss, resulting in reduced accuracy, particularly for tilted trees. While cylinder fitting algorithms provide a three-dimensional (3D) solution for trunk detection, their performance in complex forest environments remains limited due to sensitivity to parameters like distance thresholds. To address these challenges, this study proposes an improved individual tree trunk detection algorithm, Random Sample Consensus Cylinder Fitting (RANSAC-CyF), specifically optimized for detecting cylindrical tree trunks. Validated in three forest plots with varying complexities in Tianhe District, Guangzhou, the algorithm demonstrated significant advantages in the inlier rate, detection success rate, and robustness for tilted trees. The study showed the following results: (1) The average difference between the inlier rates of tree trunks and non-tree points for the three sample plots using RANSAC-CyF were 0.59, 0.63, and 0.52, respectively, which were significantly higher than those using the Least Squares Circle Fitting (LSCF) algorithm and the Random Sample Consensus Circle Fitting (RANSAC-CF) algorithm ( < 0.05). (2) RANSAC-CyF required only 2 and 8 clusters to achieve a 100% detection success rate in Plot 1 and Plot 2, while the other algorithms needed 26 and 40 clusters. (3) The effective distance threshold range of RANSAC-CyF was more than twice that of the comparison algorithms, maintaining stable inlier rates above 0.9 across all tilt angles. (4) The RANSAC-CyF algorithm still achieved good detection performance in the challenging Plot 3. Together, the other two algorithms failed to detect. The findings highlight the RANSAC-CyF algorithm's superior accuracy, robustness, and adaptability in complex forest environments, significantly improving the efficiency and precision of individual tree trunk detection for forestry surveys and ecological research.

摘要

激光雷达技术在提取单株树木和林分参数方面的应用在森林调查中起着至关重要的作用。准确识别单株树木的树干是后续参数提取的关键基础。对于激光雷达获取的森林点云数据,现有的基于二维(2D)平面的树干检测算法往往存在空间信息丢失的问题,导致精度降低,特别是对于倾斜树木。虽然圆柱拟合算法为树干检测提供了三维(3D)解决方案,但由于对距离阈值等参数敏感,其在复杂森林环境中的性能仍然有限。为了应对这些挑战,本研究提出了一种改进的单株树木树干检测算法,即随机抽样一致性圆柱拟合(RANSAC-CyF),专门针对检测圆柱形树干进行了优化。在广州天河区三个复杂度不同的森林样地中进行验证,该算法在内点率、检测成功率和对倾斜树木的鲁棒性方面表现出显著优势。研究结果如下:(1)使用RANSAC-CyF的三个样地中,树干内点率与非树点内点率的平均差值分别为0.59、0.63和0.52,显著高于使用最小二乘圆拟合(LSCF)算法和随机抽样一致性圆拟合(RANSAC-CF)算法的差值(<0.05)。(2)RANSAC-CyF在样地1和样地2中仅需2个和8个聚类就能达到100%的检测成功率,而其他算法则需要26个和40个聚类。(3)RANSAC-CyF的有效距离阈值范围是比较算法的两倍多,在所有倾斜角度下内点率均保持在0.9以上且稳定。(4)RANSAC-CyF算法在具有挑战性的样地3中仍取得了良好的检测性能。而其他两种算法则未能检测到。这些发现突出了RANSAC-CyF算法在复杂森林环境中的卓越准确性、鲁棒性和适应性,显著提高了林业调查和生态研究中单株树木树干检测的效率和精度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/c946fcd70b38/sensors-25-00714-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/d9dc315b217e/sensors-25-00714-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/fc60ec293214/sensors-25-00714-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/6fe0c0fa0a4a/sensors-25-00714-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/a02fd4edb0e7/sensors-25-00714-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/616e5c50b454/sensors-25-00714-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/c4c3671bb8a4/sensors-25-00714-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/7a932dfadd95/sensors-25-00714-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/19fac2be3a87/sensors-25-00714-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/e390d4e79690/sensors-25-00714-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/3f95d9d3b4ce/sensors-25-00714-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/3c9e7b9e112a/sensors-25-00714-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/6d864af4d12b/sensors-25-00714-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/99207f350d5b/sensors-25-00714-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/c946fcd70b38/sensors-25-00714-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/d9dc315b217e/sensors-25-00714-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/fc60ec293214/sensors-25-00714-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/6fe0c0fa0a4a/sensors-25-00714-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/a02fd4edb0e7/sensors-25-00714-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/616e5c50b454/sensors-25-00714-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/c4c3671bb8a4/sensors-25-00714-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/7a932dfadd95/sensors-25-00714-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/19fac2be3a87/sensors-25-00714-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/e390d4e79690/sensors-25-00714-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/3f95d9d3b4ce/sensors-25-00714-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/3c9e7b9e112a/sensors-25-00714-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/6d864af4d12b/sensors-25-00714-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/99207f350d5b/sensors-25-00714-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a73e/11820748/c946fcd70b38/sensors-25-00714-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Improved Cylinder-Based Tree Trunk Detection in LiDAR Point Clouds for Forestry Applications.用于林业应用的激光雷达点云中基于改进圆柱体的树干检测
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;25(3):714. doi: 10.3390/s25030714.
2
Tree parameter extraction in plantation based on airborne LiDAR data.基于机载 LiDAR 数据的人工林树木参数提取。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Feb;35(2):321-329. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.015.
3
Extracting Diameter at Breast Height with a Handheld Mobile LiDAR System in an Outdoor Environment.在户外环境中使用手持式移动激光雷达系统提取胸径
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 21;19(14):3212. doi: 10.3390/s19143212.
4
Automated low-cost terrestrial laser scanner for measuring diameters at breast height and heights of plantation trees.自动化低成本地面激光扫描仪,用于测量胸径和人工林树木高度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0209888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209888. eCollection 2019.
5
LiDAR point cloud denoising for individual tree extraction based on the Noise4Denoise.基于Noise4Denoise的用于单木提取的激光雷达点云去噪
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 9;15:1490660. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1490660. eCollection 2024.
6
Improved RANSAC Point Cloud Spherical Target Detection and Parameter Estimation Method Based on Principal Curvature Constraint.基于主曲率约束的改进 RANSAC 点云球型目标检测与参数估计方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;22(15):5850. doi: 10.3390/s22155850.
7
NCC-RANSAC: a fast plane extraction method for 3-D range data segmentation.NCC-RANSAC:一种用于三维距离数据分割的快速平面提取方法。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2014 Dec;44(12):2771-83. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2316282. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
LiDAR Dynamic Target Detection Based on Multidimensional Features.基于多维特征的激光雷达动态目标检测
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;24(5):1369. doi: 10.3390/s24051369.
9
Applicability of personal laser scanning in forestry inventory.个人激光扫描在林业清查中的适用性。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0211392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211392. eCollection 2019.
10
Individual tree segmentation of airborne and UAV LiDAR point clouds based on the watershed and optimized connection center evolution clustering.基于分水岭算法和优化连接中心演化聚类的机载和无人机激光雷达点云单木分割
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e10297. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10297. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Terrestrial laser scanning: a new standard of forest measuring and modelling?地面激光扫描:森林测量和建模的新标准?
Ann Bot. 2021 Oct 27;128(6):653-662. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab111.
2
Automatic extraction and measurement of individual trees from mobile laser scanning point clouds of forests.从森林的移动激光扫描点云中自动提取和测量单棵树。
Ann Bot. 2021 Oct 27;128(6):787-804. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab087.
3
3D Forest: An application for descriptions of three-dimensional forest structures using terrestrial LiDAR.3D森林:一种使用地面激光雷达描述三维森林结构的应用程序。
PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0176871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176871. eCollection 2017.
4
USAC: a universal framework for random sample consensus.USAC:一种通用的随机抽样一致性框架。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Aug;35(8):2022-38. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.257.
5
Automatic stem mapping by merging several terrestrial laser scans at the feature and decision levels.通过在特征和决策层面合并多个地面激光扫描实现自动茎映射。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jan 25;13(2):1614-34. doi: 10.3390/s130201614.