Ogram A V, Jessup R E, Ou L T, Rao P S
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Mar;49(3):582-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.3.582-587.1985.
Three mathematical models were proposed to describe the effects of sorption of both bacteria and the herbicide (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) on the biological degradation rates of 2,4-D in soils. Model 1 assumed that sorbed 2,4-D is not degraded, that only bacteria in solution are capable of degrading 2,4-D in solution, and that sorbed bacteria are not capable of degrading either sorbed or solution 2,4-D. Model 2 stated that only bacteria in the solution phase degrade 2,4-D in solution and that only sorbed bacteria degrade sorbed 2,4-D. Model 3 proposed that sorbed 2,4-D is completely protected from degradation and that both sorbed and solution bacteria are capable of degrading 2,4-D in solution. These models were tested by a series of controlled laboratory experiments. Models 1 and 2 did not describe the data satisfactorily and were rejected. Model 3 described the experimental results quite well, indicating that sorbed 2,4-D was completely protected from biological degradation and that sorbed- and solution-phase bacteria degraded solution-phase 2,4-D with almost equal efficiencies.
提出了三种数学模型来描述细菌和除草剂(2,4-二氯苯氧基)乙酸(2,4-D)的吸附对土壤中2,4-D生物降解速率的影响。模型1假定吸附的2,4-D不会降解,只有溶液中的细菌能够降解溶液中的2,4-D,且吸附的细菌不能降解吸附态或溶液态的2,4-D。模型2指出只有液相中的细菌降解溶液中的2,4-D,只有吸附的细菌降解吸附的2,4-D。模型3提出吸附的2,4-D完全受到保护不被降解,且吸附态和溶液态的细菌都能够降解溶液中的2,4-D。通过一系列受控的实验室实验对这些模型进行了测试。模型1和2不能令人满意地描述数据,因此被否决。模型3很好地描述了实验结果,表明吸附的2,4-D完全受到保护不被生物降解,且吸附相和溶液相的细菌降解溶液相2,4-D的效率几乎相同。