Torres Cristina, Lyden Elizabeth, Gillett Gayle, Rupp Mark E, Van Schooneveld Trevor C
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 13;46(4):1-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2025.2.
We introduced a urinary tract infection (UTI) panel requiring symptom documentation and identification of special populations linked to reflex urine culturing and evaluated its impact on catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) including during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Quasi-experimental encompassing 3 periods: pre-panel (January 2014-March 2015), post-panel (April 2015-March 2020), and post-panel COVID (April 2020-June 2022).
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Tertiary care center inpatients.
Poisson regression and interrupted time series (ITS) analysis evaluated changes in catheter days (CD), urine cultures (UC), and CAUTI measured by 1,000 CD and patient days (PD). National Health Safety Network standardized infection ratio (SIR) and standardized utilization ratio (SUR) data were analyzed.
UC per 1,000 PD decreased after implementation (pre-panel 36.9 vs 16.6 post-panel vs 14.4 post-panel COVID, all < .001). CD declined pre-panel versus post-panel (RR 0.37, < .001) but not from post-panel to post-panel COVID (RR 0.94, = .88). UTI panel implementation was associated with a 40% decrease in CAUTI rates per 1,000 CD ( < .001). During the COVID-19 pandemic (post-panel COVID), a nonsignificant increase of 13% ( = .61) in CAUTI was noted but remained 32% lower than pre-panel ( = .02). The slope of change using ITS changed from negative to positive but was nonsignificant ( = .26). CAUTI rates per 1,000 PD demonstrated greater reductions (pre- vs post-panel (RR 0.37; 95% CI, 0.29-0.47) and pre- vs post-panel COVID (RR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26-0.46)). SIRs were unavailable before 2016, but median SIRs post-panel compared to post-panel COVID were similar (1.05 vs 1.56, respectively, = .067).
Implementation of the UTI panel was associated with a reduction in both UC and CAUTI with the impact maintained despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
我们引入了一个尿路感染(UTI)检测项目,该项目要求记录症状并识别与反射性尿培养相关的特殊人群,并评估其对导管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的影响,包括在新冠疫情期间的影响。
准实验性研究,涵盖3个时期:检测项目实施前(2014年1月至2015年3月)、检测项目实施后(2015年4月至2020年3月)以及检测项目实施后新冠疫情期间(2020年4月至2022年6月)。
地点/参与者:三级医疗中心的住院患者。
采用泊松回归和中断时间序列(ITS)分析评估导管留置天数(CD)、尿培养(UC)以及以每1000个CD和患者住院天数(PD)衡量的CAUTI的变化。分析了国家卫生安全网络的标准化感染率(SIR)和标准化使用率(SUR)数据。
实施后每1000个PD的UC数量减少(检测项目实施前为36.9,检测项目实施后为16.6,检测项目实施后新冠疫情期间为14.4,均P<0.001)。检测项目实施前与实施后的CD有所下降(相对危险度[RR]为0.37,P<0.001),但从检测项目实施后到检测项目实施后新冠疫情期间没有下降(RR为0.94,P = 0.88)。UTI检测项目的实施与每1000个CD的CAUTI发生率降低40%相关(P<0.001)。在新冠疫情期间(检测项目实施后新冠疫情期间),CAUTI有13%的非显著性增加(P = 0.61),但仍比检测项目实施前低32%(P = 0.02)。使用ITS的变化斜率从负变为正,但无显著性差异(P = 0.26)。每1000个PD的CAUTI发生率显示出更大幅度的降低(检测项目实施前与实施后相比(RR为0.37;95%置信区间[CI]为, 0.29 - 0.47)以及检测项目实施前与实施后新冠疫情期间相比(RR为0.35;95%CI为, 0.26 - 0.46))。2016年之前没有SIR数据,但检测项目实施后与检测项目实施后新冠疫情期间的SIR中位数相似(分别为1.05和1.56,P = 0.067)。
UTI检测项目的实施与UC和CAUTI的减少相关,尽管有新冠疫情,但其影响仍然持续。