• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同表面处理方案的正畸保持器性能的比较评估:一项体外研究。

Comparative evaluation of the performance of orthodontic retainers using different surface protocols: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Kurnaz Merve, Nazan Ali Arslan, Eraydın Feyza

机构信息

Istanbul Kent University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Private Company Permatter LLC, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 13;40(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04348-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-025-04348-4
PMID:39945873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11825553/
Abstract

This study aims to assess the in vitro durability of Nitinol retainers, manufactured using computer-aided methods with hydrophilic or superhydrophilic surfaces to reduce debonding, alongside a commonly used composite adhesive. The 112 lower incisor teeth were embedded in blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were made up of 0.018 × 0.018 inch Nickel Titanium alloy(G4™ Nickel Titanium G&H Orthodontics, USA) by bending a robot arm. A total of 16 teeth(8 blocks) were used for each of the mentioned 7 groups Ni-Ti Retainer; Laser Textured Ni-Ti Retainer; Laser Texturing and Atmospheric Plasma Applicated Ni-Ti Retainer; Atmospheric Plasma Applicated Ni-Ti Retainer; Laser Texturing and Atmospheric Plasma Applicated Ni-Ti Retainer2; Laser Texturing and Atmospheric Plasma Applicated Ni-Ti Retainer3; SS-0.0018"(Morelli, Brazil). Transbond LR(3 M Unitek, California) was used. The shear bond strength tests were conducted. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was employed, pairwise comparisons followed by Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction as a post-hoc analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for maximum force and maximum stress(p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was found in maximum elongation (p:0.0023). Pairwise comparisons highlighted significantly higher elongation values in the SS-0.0018" group. The stainless-steel wire demonstrated higher elongation values, which may offer clinical advantages in cases with higher occlusal forces and periodontal problems due to its material flexibility. Laser Texturing and Atmospheric Plasma Applied Ni-Ti Retainers exhibited higher test performance. Surface treatments applied to CAD/CAM retainers can provide an advantage by enhancing bond strength, potentially reducing the risk of debonding. These findings underline the importance of material selection and surface treatments in optimizing fixed retention strategies for long-term clinical success.

摘要

本研究旨在评估采用计算机辅助方法制造的、具有亲水性或超亲水性表面以减少脱粘的镍钛保持器与常用复合粘合剂一起的体外耐久性。112颗下切牙成对嵌入块体中。保持器丝由0.018×0.018英寸的镍钛合金(G4™镍钛合金,G&H正畸公司,美国)通过机器人手臂弯曲制成。上述7组中的每组使用16颗牙齿(8个块体):镍钛保持器;激光纹理化镍钛保持器;激光纹理化和大气等离子体处理镍钛保持器;大气等离子体处理镍钛保持器;激光纹理化和大气等离子体处理镍钛保持器2;激光纹理化和大气等离子体处理镍钛保持器3;SS-0.0018"(莫雷利,巴西)。使用Transbond LR(3M Unitek,加利福尼亚)。进行了剪切粘结强度测试。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,随后进行两两比较,并采用Dunn检验和Bonferroni校正作为事后分析。各组之间在最大力和最大应力方面无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,在最大伸长率方面发现了显著差异(p:0.0023)。两两比较突出显示SS-0.0018"组的伸长率值显著更高。不锈钢丝显示出更高的伸长率值,由于其材料柔韧性,在咬合力较高和存在牙周问题的情况下可能具有临床优势。激光纹理化和大气等离子体处理的镍钛保持器表现出更高的测试性能。应用于CAD/CAM保持器的表面处理可通过提高粘结强度提供优势,潜在地降低脱粘风险。这些发现强调了材料选择和表面处理在优化固定保持策略以实现长期临床成功方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/efb40fcb98fd/10103_2025_4348_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/7a60dfd15117/10103_2025_4348_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/5e1197eabe12/10103_2025_4348_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/834990fe15e8/10103_2025_4348_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/efb40fcb98fd/10103_2025_4348_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/7a60dfd15117/10103_2025_4348_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/5e1197eabe12/10103_2025_4348_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/834990fe15e8/10103_2025_4348_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc63/11825553/efb40fcb98fd/10103_2025_4348_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the performance of orthodontic retainers using different surface protocols: an in vitro study.使用不同表面处理方案的正畸保持器性能的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 13;40(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04348-4.
2
Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel twistflex retainer: an in vitro investigation of survival rate and stability.六种不同的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)固位体与不锈钢丝圈式固位体的比较:一项关于生存率和稳定性的体外研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Mar;86(2):119-128. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00486-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Different Wire Surface Treatments on Adhesion Efficacy of Orthodontic Fixed Retainer: An Study.不同线材表面处理对正畸固定保持器黏附效果的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Jul 1;25(7):677-683. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3726.
4
Antibacterial activity and debonding force of different lingual retainers bonded with conventional composite and nanoparticle containing composite: An in vitro study.不同舌侧保持器与传统复合树脂和含纳米颗粒复合树脂黏接的抗菌活性和抗剪切强度:一项体外研究。
J World Fed Orthod. 2020 Jun;9(2):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.舌侧固定保持器中金属丝与复合材料之间的拉伸试验及界面保持力
Int Orthod. 2015 Jun;13(2):210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 May 21.
6
Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study.计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造个性化镍钛舌侧保持器的生物力学性能:一项体外研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Sep;79(5):309-319. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0144-2. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
7
Elemental composition, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers.计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造保持器与传统保持器的元素组成、耐腐蚀性和机械性能比较。
J Oral Sci. 2024 Apr 16;66(2):107-110. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.23-0303. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
8
Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial.比较 CAD/CAM 镍钛舌侧保持器、传统固定保持器和可摘保持器对牙齿稳定性和牙周健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 May;24(2):241-250. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12425. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
9
Shear bond strength of different fixed orthodontic retainers.不同固定正畸保持器的剪切粘结强度
Aust Orthod J. 2015 Nov;31(2):178-83.
10
The effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers.钢丝预先喷砂处理对两种不同类型舌侧固位体剪切粘结强度的影响。
Int Orthod. 2018 Jun;16(2):294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of survival rate and duration of maxillary and mandibular lingual bonded retainers - a retrospective cohort study.上颌和下颌舌侧粘结式保持器的生存率和持续时间比较——一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06314-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The corrosion products of proprietary and generic orthodontic fixed lingual retainers and their in-vitro cytotoxicity.专利和通用正畸固定舌侧保持器的腐蚀产物及其体外细胞毒性。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Nov 1;94(6):664-671. doi: 10.2319/112823-788.1.
2
The prevalence of the failure of fixed orthodontic bonded retainers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.固定正畸粘接保持器失败的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 Nov 30;45(6):645-661. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad047.
3
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.
正畸治疗后稳定牙齿位置的保持程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5(5):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5.
4
Evaluation of the Corrosion Resistance of Different Types of Orthodontic Fixed Retention Appliances: A Preliminary Laboratory Study.不同类型正畸固定保持器的耐腐蚀性评估:一项初步实验室研究。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jan 31;14(2):81. doi: 10.3390/jfb14020081.
5
Effect of thermocycling-induced stress on properties of orthodontic NiTi wires.热循环诱导应力对正畸镍钛丝性能的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2022 Oct;17(4):1788-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Evaluation of digital construction, production and intraoral position accuracy of novel 3D CAD/CAM titanium retainers.新型3D CAD/CAM钛合金固位体的数字化构建、制作及口内就位精度评估
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Nov;84(6):384-391. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00393-8. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Surface modification of zirconia dental implants by laser texturing.通过激光纹理化对氧化锆牙科植入物进行表面改性。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Feb;37(1):77-93. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03475-y. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
Shear Bond Strength of Four Types of Orthodontic Retainers after Thermocycling and Cyclic Loading.热循环和循环加载后四种正畸保持器的剪切粘结强度
Int J Dent. 2021 Jun 30;2021:9424040. doi: 10.1155/2021/9424040. eCollection 2021.
9
Fixed retention: pitfalls and complications.固定修复体的保留:陷阱和并发症。
Br Dent J. 2021 Jun;230(11):703-708. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-2892-4. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
10
The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces.正畸保持器的材料类型和位置在抵抗轴向力或颊向力方面的作用。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 29;14(9):2319. doi: 10.3390/ma14092319.