Campbell Derrick F, Alameri Mansoor, Macahilig-Rice Felicity, Witkin Sean E, Hellman Nancy G
College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, TX 78739, United States.
College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences, San Marcos, CA 92069, United States.
Phys Ther. 2025 Apr 2;105(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf015.
Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance. The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.
A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used. University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored. Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multicampus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences. DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study. Clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.
The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on ICE and each of TCE I and TCE II. Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on ICE and TCEs and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.
Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.
This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.
修订后的美国物理治疗协会(APTA)物理治疗师临床绩效工具(PT CPI 3.0)的验证对于确保我们有效评估物理治疗博士(DPT)学生的临床绩效至关重要。目的是验证修订后的PT CPI 3.0用于DPT学生作为临床绩效的一种衡量方法。
采用描述性和探索性相结合的横断面回顾性和前瞻性队列设计。对大学DPT学生的临床教育经历进行了探索。参与者是从2023年秋季和2024年春季临床教育经历中,使用来自1个美国多校区DPT项目的693名DPT学生的便利样本选取的。参与(1)综合临床教育(ICE)和(2)2次终末期临床教育经历(TCE I和TCE II)的DPT学生参与了该研究。调查了临床教师在临床教育经历期间对DPT学生在中期和期末评估时的PT CPI 3.0项目评分。描述性和推断性统计评估了临床教师在临床教育经历期间对DPT学生的PT CPI 3.0项目评分之间的差异。
PT CPI 3.0显示出良好的内部信度,单因素解决方案的因子分析解释了81.3%的方差。ICE上的DPT学生与TCE I和TCE II中的每一组学生在PT CPI项目得分上的显著差异支持了结构效度。ICE和TCE上的DPT学生从中期到期末评估的得分显著增加,以及先前临床经验与剩余理论课程作业之间的中度到高度相关性,支持了结构效度和收敛效度。
研究结果支持修订后的PT CPI 3.0作为临床绩效衡量方法的有效性。一个局限性是本研究未评估评分者信度。
本研究为新修订的APTA PT CPI 3.0作为评估入门级物理治疗师学生临床绩效的一种措施的验证提供了初步支持。