East Katherine, Taylor Eve, McNeill Ann, Bakolis Ioannis, Taylor Amy E, Maynard Olivia M, Munafò Marcus R, Khouja Jasmine
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jul 22;27(8):1479-1485. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf018.
There is a lack of evidence on whether vaping harm perceptions can predict vaping and smoking behaviors among young adults in the United Kingdom. We aimed to assess whether the perceived harm of vaping relative to smoking is associated with subsequent changes in vaping and smoking behaviors in this population.
Data were from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a prospective cohort study. Longitudinal associations were assessed between the perceived harm of vaping relative to smoking at baseline (approximately 24 years old; Nov'15-Aug'17) and the following smoking/vaping outcomes at follow-up (approximately 30 years old; May-Oct'22): (1) stopping smoking, (2) initiation of ever smoking and/or vaping, and (3) uptake of past 30-day smoking and/or vaping. Multinomial logistic regressions were used, adjusting for sociodemographic factors.
Among young adults who smoked but did not vape at baseline (n = 687), the perception that vaping is less harmful than smoking (vs. equally/more harmful, or don't know) was associated with stopping smoking and now vaping at follow-up (adjusted Relative Risk Ratio (aRRR)=1.69, 95%CI = 1.02 to 2.81, p = .04). Initiation of ever smoking/vaping, or uptake of past 30-day smoking/vaping, were not common during the study period and there was little evidence that these outcomes were associated with relative vaping harm perceptions at baseline.
Among young adults who smoke, perceiving vaping as less harmful than smoking was associated with switching from smoking to vaping six years later. Few young adults who did not smoke or vape initiated these behaviors during the study period.
This is the first study in England to find that young adults who smoked and who accurately perceived vaping as less harmful than smoking were more likely to switch to vaping 6 years later. This is consistent with prior studies among adults and highlights the need for interventions to improve the pervasive misperceptions about vaping that are currently observed among young adults who smoke.
关于在英国年轻人中,对电子烟危害的认知是否能预测其电子烟使用和吸烟行为,目前缺乏相关证据。我们旨在评估在这一人群中,相对于吸烟,对电子烟危害的认知与随后电子烟使用和吸烟行为的变化是否相关。
数据来自阿冯父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC),这是一项前瞻性队列研究。评估了在基线时(约24岁;2015年11月 - 2017年8月)相对于吸烟,对电子烟危害的认知与随访时(约30岁;2022年5月 - 10月)以下吸烟/电子烟使用结果之间的纵向关联:(1)戒烟,(2)开始吸烟和/或使用电子烟,以及(3)过去30天吸烟和/或使用电子烟。使用多项逻辑回归,并对社会人口学因素进行了调整。
在基线时吸烟但不使用电子烟的年轻人中(n = 687),认为电子烟危害小于吸烟(与同样/更有害,或不知道相比)与随访时戒烟并开始使用电子烟相关(调整后的相对风险比(aRRR)= 1.69,95%置信区间 = 1.02至2.81,p = 0.04)。在研究期间,开始吸烟/使用电子烟或过去30天吸烟/使用电子烟的情况并不常见,几乎没有证据表明这些结果与基线时对电子烟相对危害的认知相关。
在吸烟的年轻人中,认为电子烟危害小于吸烟与六年后从吸烟转向使用电子烟相关。在研究期间,很少有不吸烟或不使用电子烟的年轻人开始这些行为。
这是英国的第一项研究,发现吸烟且准确认为电子烟危害小于吸烟的年轻人在6年后更有可能转向使用电子烟。这与之前针对成年人的研究一致,并凸显了需要进行干预,以改善目前在吸烟的年轻人中普遍存在的对电子烟的错误认知。