• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雷帕霉素涂层/洗脱装置治疗外周动脉疾病疗效与安全性的系统评价和Meta分析

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Limus-Coated/Eluting Devices in Peripheral Arterial Disease.

作者信息

Mok Michelle Kam Yan, Wu Iris Ho Ching, Yau Kenneth Hong Kit, Chan Yiu Che

机构信息

Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Feb 14:15266028251315442. doi: 10.1177/15266028251315442.

DOI:10.1177/15266028251315442
PMID:39950413
Abstract

AIM

Limus-based balloons, stents, and scaffolds are alternatives to paclitaxel-coated devices in peripheral endovascular treatment. This study aims to review contemporary evidence on the efficacy and safety of limus-coated devices in the treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Web of Sciences, OvidSP, and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Efficacy endpoints were primary patency (PP), freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and Rutherford-Becker improvement; safety endpoints included target limb amputation and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

From a primary search of 453 articles between 27th June 2002 to 15th September 2024, 30 publications, among which were 27 prospective trials, 10 multicenter studies and 11 double-arm studies, with 2325 patients were analyzed. The numbers for above-the-knee (ATK) limus-balloons, stents, scaffolds and below-the-knee (BTK) limus-balloons, stents, scaffolds were 76, 333, 35, 55, 1445, 381 respectively. With a mean 12-month follow-up, PP for ATK lesions was 86.50% for sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB), 86.80% for sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 72.60% for everolimus-eluting stents (EES), 86.20% for everolimus bioresorbable vascular scaffold (EBVS); whereas PP for BTK lesions was 72.60%, 73.20%, 71.60 and 83.80% respectively. Absence of CD TLR for ATK lesions was 96.50%, 95.50%, 87.60%, 89.20% respectively; meanwhile 84.90%, 75.80%, 87.70%, 94.30% for BTK lesions respectively. Rutherford-Becker improvement with 86.70%, 84.50%, 79.80 and 90.80% were seen in ATK lesions respectively, similarly, 76.50%, 81.90%, 79.50%, 92.30% respectively were observed in BTK lesions. Efficacy and clinical outcomes of SES, EES and EBVS in BTK lesions were significantly superior, where vascular complications had no proven significant difference regardless of lesion locations nor device types.

CONCLUSION

Limus-coated/eluting balloons, stents, and scaffolds are safe adjuncts and potentially superior alternative in endovascular treatment for lower extremity PAD, especially well proven in BTK lesions. However, more statistically significant evidence is recommended to validate the long-term efficacy on ATK lesions and overall use of non-SES devices regardless of locations.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Limus (siro-, zotaro-, evero-, bio-, amphi-, tacrolimus) have potent antiproliferative effects in atherosclerosis. This systematic review analyzes evidence for the efficacy and safety of limus devices (balloons, stents, and scaffolds) in the treatment of femoropopliteal and below-the-knee PAD. There were 5 single-arm studies with 309 patients on femoropopliteal disease, and 11 studies with 679 patients on below-the knee (BTK) diseases. The overall primary patency rate, significant freedom from target lesion revascularization and improvement in Rutherford-Becker classification were high. Certain limus devices have shown to be superior to non-limus devices. Limus scaffolds are new developments with promising short-term results.

摘要

目的

在周围血管腔内治疗中,基于雷帕霉素的球囊、支架和支架植入物是紫杉醇涂层器械的替代方案。本研究旨在综述有关雷帕霉素涂层器械治疗下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)疗效和安全性的当代证据。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,使用PubMed、Web of Sciences、OvidSP和EMBASE进行系统文献综述。疗效终点为主要通畅率(PP)、免于临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(CD-TLR)和卢瑟福-贝克尔分级改善;安全终点包括靶肢体截肢和全因死亡率。

结果

在对2002年6月27日至2024年9月15日期间的453篇文章进行初步检索后,分析了30篇出版物,其中包括27项前瞻性试验、10项多中心研究和11项双臂研究,共2325例患者。膝上(ATK)雷帕霉素球囊、支架、支架植入物以及膝下(BTK)雷帕霉素球囊、支架、支架植入物的数量分别为76、333、35、55、1445、381。平均随访12个月时,ATK病变的PP在西罗莫司涂层球囊(SCB)中为86.50%,西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)中为86.80%,依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)中为72.60%,依维莫司生物可吸收血管支架(EBVS)中为86.20%;而BTK病变的PP分别为72.60%、73.20%、71.60%和83.80%。ATK病变中无CD TLR的比例分别为96.50%、95.50%、87.60%、89.20%;同时,BTK病变中分别为84.90%、75.80%、87.70%、94.30%。ATK病变中卢瑟福-贝克尔分级改善的比例分别为86.70%、84.50%、79.80%和90.80%,同样,BTK病变中分别观察到76.50%、81.90%、79.50%、92.30%。SES、EES和EBVS在BTK病变中的疗效和临床结局显著更优,无论病变部位或器械类型,血管并发症均无经证实的显著差异。

结论

雷帕霉素涂层/洗脱球囊、支架和支架植入物是下肢PAD血管腔内治疗中的安全辅助手段,且可能是更优的替代方案,尤其在BTK病变中得到充分证实。然而,建议有更多具有统计学意义的证据来验证其对ATK病变的长期疗效以及非SES器械在所有部位的整体应用效果。

临床意义

雷帕霉素(西罗莫司、佐他莫司、依维莫司、生物雷帕霉素、两性霉素、他克莫司)在动脉粥样硬化中具有强大的抗增殖作用。本系统评价分析了雷帕霉素器械(球囊、支架和支架植入物)治疗股腘动脉和膝下PAD疗效和安全性的证据。有5项单臂研究共309例患者涉及股腘动脉疾病,11项研究共679例患者涉及膝下(BTK)疾病。总体主要通畅率、免于靶病变血运重建的显著比例以及卢瑟福-贝克尔分级改善情况均较高。某些雷帕霉素器械已显示优于非雷帕霉素器械。雷帕霉素支架是具有良好短期效果的新进展。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Limus-Coated/Eluting Devices in Peripheral Arterial Disease.雷帕霉素涂层/洗脱装置治疗外周动脉疾病疗效与安全性的系统评价和Meta分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Feb 14:15266028251315442. doi: 10.1177/15266028251315442.
2
MagicTouch PTA Sirolimus Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal and Below the Knee Disease: Results From XTOSI Pilot Study Up To 12 Months.用于股腘动脉及膝下疾病的MagicTouch PTA西罗莫司涂层球囊:XTOSI初步研究长达12个月的结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Oct;29(5):780-789. doi: 10.1177/15266028211064816. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Robustness of Longitudinal Safety and Efficacy After Paclitaxel-Based Endovascular Therapy for Treatment of Femoro-Popliteal Artery Occlusive Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于紫杉醇的腔内治疗治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的纵向安全性和疗效的稳健性:随机对照试验的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:164-178. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
Short- and Mid-Term Efficacy and Safety of Novel Sirolimus-Coated Balloon for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.新型西罗莫司涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉病变的短期和中期疗效及安全性:单臂荟萃分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Apr 21:15266028251328156. doi: 10.1177/15266028251328156.
5
The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis.药物涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架在腘下血管重建中的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Jan 6:15266028231222385. doi: 10.1177/15266028231222385.
6
Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs.药物洗脱球囊血管成形术与未涂层球囊血管成形术治疗下肢外周动脉疾病的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 4;2016(8):CD011319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011319.pub2.
7
Temsirolimus Adventitial Delivery to Improve ANGiographic Outcomes Below the Knee.替西罗莫司血管外膜递送来改善膝下的血管造影结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Aug;31(4):562-575. doi: 10.1177/15266028221131459. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Six-Month Outcomes From the First-in-Human, Single-Arm SELUTION Sustained-Limus-Release Drug-Eluting Balloon Trial in Femoropopliteal Lesions.首例人体单臂SELUTION持续释放雷帕霉素药物洗脱球囊治疗股腘动脉病变试验的六个月结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):683-690. doi: 10.1177/1526602820941811. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Below-the-Knee Arterial Disease: A Literature Review of New Developments.用于膝下动脉疾病的生物可吸收支架:新进展的文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504133. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Amputation-free Survival in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Treated with Paclitaxel-eluting Stents and Paclitaxel-coated Balloons.使用紫杉醇洗脱支架和紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗的严重肢体缺血患者的无截肢生存期
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 Jun 15.