Cui Hong-Jie, Wu Ying-Feng
Department of Vascular Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, 101199 Beijing, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504133. eCollection 2024 Apr.
This review aimed to explore the therapeutic effect of bioabsorbable stents in the inferior genicular artery, from the emergence of absorbable bare metal stents to the latest technology in polymer and anti-proliferative eluting drugs mixed with coated bioresorbable vascular stents (BVSs). Currently, there are conflicting data regarding the safety and effectiveness of BVSs in infrapopliteal artery interventions, especially compared to the current generation of drug-eluting stents (DESs). This review will cover the existing data on BVSs in reconstructing the infrapopliteal arterial blood flow and active clinical trials for future iterations of BVSs. In terms of primary patency rate and target lesion revascularization rate, the available research on the effectiveness of BVSs in reconstructing the infrapopliteal arterial blood flow suggests that a BVS is compatible with current DESs within 3-12 months; long-term data have not yet been reported. The ABSORB BVS is the most studied BVS in cardiovascular disease (CAD). Initially, the ABSORB BVS showed promising results. Managing intricate regions in peripheral artery disorders, such as branching or lengthy lesions, continues to be a formidable undertaking. In contrast to the advanced narrowing of arteries seen in standard permanent stent procedures, bioabsorbable stents have the potential to promote the expansion and beneficial merging of blood channels in the latter stages. Furthermore, incorporating stents and re-establishing the endothelial function can diminish the probability of restenosis or thrombosis. Nevertheless, the extent to which bioabsorbable stents may simultaneously preserve arterial patency and guarantee their structural integrity remains uncertain. The powerful and intricate mechanical stresses exerted by the blood in the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery can cause negative consequences on any implant inserted into the vessel, regardless of its composition, even metal. Furthermore, incorporating stents is advantageous for treating persistent occlusive lesions since it does not impact later treatments, including corrective bypass operations. Evidence is scarce about the use of bioabsorbable stents in treating infrapopliteal lesions. Utilizing bioabsorbable stents in minor infrapopliteal lesions can successfully maintain the patency of the blood vessel lumen, whereas balloon angioplasty cannot offer this benefit. The primary focus of testing these materials is determining whether bioabsorbable scaffolds can provide adequate radial force in highly calcified elongated lesions. Indeed, using "-limus" medication elution technology in conjunction with bioabsorbable stents has previously offered clinical benefits in treating the popliteal artery, as evidenced by limited trials.BVSs for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) show promise and have the potential to offer a less inflammatory and more vessel-friendly option compared to permanent metallic stents. However, current evidence does not yet allow for a universal recommendation for their use. Thus, ongoing, and future studies, such as those examining the newer generation of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) with improved mechanical properties and resorption profiles, will be crucial in defining the role of BRSs in managing PAD.
本综述旨在探讨生物可吸收支架在膝下动脉的治疗效果,涵盖从可吸收裸金属支架的出现到聚合物与抗增殖洗脱药物混合涂层生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)的最新技术。目前,关于BVS在腘下动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性存在相互矛盾的数据,尤其是与当前一代药物洗脱支架(DES)相比。本综述将涵盖BVS在重建腘下动脉血流方面的现有数据以及BVS未来迭代的正在进行的临床试验。就主要通畅率和靶病变血管重建率而言,关于BVS在重建腘下动脉血流有效性的现有研究表明,BVS在3至12个月内与当前DES兼容;长期数据尚未报道。ABSORB BVS是心血管疾病(CAD)中研究最多的BVS。最初,ABSORB BVS显示出有希望的结果。处理外周动脉疾病中的复杂区域,如分支或长病变,仍然是一项艰巨的任务。与标准永久支架手术中看到的动脉严重狭窄相比,生物可吸收支架有可能在后期促进血管通道的扩张和有益融合。此外,置入支架并恢复内皮功能可以降低再狭窄或血栓形成的可能性。然而,生物可吸收支架在多大程度上能够同时保持动脉通畅并保证其结构完整性仍不确定。股浅动脉和腘动脉中的血液施加的强大而复杂的机械应力可能会对植入血管的任何植入物产生负面影响,无论其成分如何,即使是金属植入物。此外,置入支架有利于治疗持续性闭塞性病变,因为它不会影响后续治疗,包括矫正性搭桥手术。关于生物可吸收支架在治疗腘下病变中的应用证据很少。在轻微的腘下病变中使用生物可吸收支架可以成功维持血管腔的通畅,而球囊血管成形术则无法提供这种益处。测试这些材料的主要重点是确定生物可吸收支架在高度钙化的长病变中能否提供足够的径向力。事实上,先前有限的试验证明,将“-limus”药物洗脱技术与生物可吸收支架结合使用在治疗腘动脉方面具有临床益处。用于外周动脉疾病(PAD)的BVS显示出前景,与永久性金属支架相比,有可能提供炎症性更小、对血管更友好的选择。然而,目前的证据尚不允许普遍推荐使用它们。因此正在进行的以及未来的研究,例如那些研究具有改善的机械性能和吸收特性的新一代生物可吸收支架(BRS)的研究,对于确定BRS在管理PAD中的作用至关重要。