Kiesewetter Kasey N, Rawstern Amanda H, Cline Eric, Ortiz Gina R, Santamaria Fabiola, Coronado-Molina Carlos, Sklar Fred H, Afkhami Michelle E
Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2025 Jan;35(1):e70007. doi: 10.1002/eap.70007.
As ecosystems face unprecedented change and habitat loss, pursuing comprehensive and resilient habitat restoration will be integral to protecting and maintaining natural areas and the services they provide. Microbiomes offer an important avenue for improving restoration efforts as they are integral to ecosystem health and functioning. Despite microbiomes' importance, unresolved knowledge gaps hinder their inclusion in restoration efforts. Here, we address two critical gaps in understanding microbial roles in restoration-fungal microbiomes' importance in "reconstructive" restoration efforts and how management and restoration decisions interactively impact fungal communities and their cascading effects on trees. We combined field surveys, microbiome sequencing, and greenhouse experiments to determine how reconstructing an iconic landscape feature-tree islands-in the highly imperiled Everglades impacts fungal microbiomes and fungal effects on native tree species compared with their natural counterparts under different proposed hydrological management regimes. Constructed islands used in this research were built from peat soil and limestone collected from deep sloughs and levees nearby the restoration sites in 2003, providing 18 years for microbiome assembly on constructed islands. We found that while fungal microbiomes from natural and constructed tree islands exhibited similar diversity and richness, they differed significantly in community composition. These compositional differences arose mainly from changes to which fungal taxa were present on the islands rather than changes in relative abundances. Surprisingly, ~50% of fungal hub taxa (putative keystone fungi) from natural islands were missing on constructed islands, suggesting that differences in community composition of constructed island could be important for microbiome stability and function. The differences in fungal composition between natural and constructed islands had important consequences for tree growth. Specifically, these compositional differences interacted with hydrological regime (treatments simulating management strategies) to affect woody growth across the four tree species in our experiment. Taken together, our results demonstrate that reconstructing a landscape feature without consideration of microbiomes can result in diverging fungal communities that are likely to interact with management decisions leading to meaningful consequences for foundational primary producers. Our results recommend cooperation between restoration practitioners and ecologists to evaluate opportunities for active management and restoration of microbiomes during future reconstructive restoration.
随着生态系统面临前所未有的变化和栖息地丧失,开展全面且具恢复力的栖息地恢复工作对于保护和维护自然区域及其提供的服务至关重要。微生物群落为改善恢复工作提供了一条重要途径,因为它们对于生态系统的健康和功能不可或缺。尽管微生物群落很重要,但尚未解决的知识空白阻碍了它们被纳入恢复工作中。在此,我们解决了在理解微生物在恢复中的作用方面的两个关键空白——真菌微生物群落在“重建性”恢复工作中的重要性,以及管理和恢复决策如何相互作用影响真菌群落及其对树木的连锁效应。我们结合了实地调查、微生物群落测序和温室实验,以确定在高度濒危的大沼泽地重建一个标志性景观特征——树岛,与在不同拟议水文管理方案下的自然树岛相比,如何影响真菌微生物群落以及真菌对本地树种的影响。本研究中使用的人工岛是2003年用从恢复地点附近的深泥沼和堤坝收集的泥炭土和石灰石建造的,为人工岛上的微生物群落组装提供了18年时间。我们发现,虽然自然树岛和人工树岛的真菌微生物群落表现出相似的多样性和丰富度,但它们的群落组成存在显著差异。这些组成差异主要源于岛上存在的真菌分类群的变化,而非相对丰度的变化。令人惊讶的是,人工岛上缺少约50%来自自然岛的真菌枢纽类群(假定的关键真菌),这表明人工岛群落组成的差异可能对微生物群落的稳定性和功能很重要。自然岛和人工岛之间真菌组成的差异对树木生长产生了重要影响。具体而言,这些组成差异与水文状况(模拟管理策略的处理)相互作用,影响了我们实验中四种树种的木本生长。综上所述,我们的结果表明,在不考虑微生物群落的情况下重建景观特征可能导致真菌群落分化,这些真菌群落可能与管理决策相互作用,对基础初级生产者产生有意义的影响。我们的结果建议恢复从业者和生态学家合作,以评估在未来重建性恢复期间积极管理和恢复微生物群落的机会。