Fowler Mackenzie E, Padamatinti Srihitha, Baker Elizabeth, Oates Gabriela, Nassel Ariann, Sharafeldin Noha, Williams Grant R, Giri Smith
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(3):102203. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102203. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
Older adults represent a majority of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer cases. Social determinants of health, such as neighborhood-level social vulnerability index (SVI), are associated with frailty, a predictor of mortality. The association between social vulnerability and survival is understudied.
We evaluated 876 adults ≥60y with GI cancer enrolled in the Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Registry prior to chemotherapy. Exposure was the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's SVI in tertiles. SVI ranks census tracts between 0th and 100th percentile for lowest and highest vulnerability, respectively. Outcome was survival (enrollment to end of follow-up). Associations between SVI and survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Median age of patients was 69y, 58 % were male, 22 % were non-Hispanic Black, 30 % had colorectal, 29 % had pancreatic cancer, and 70 % had stage III/IV disease. About 44 % of participants died in median 17 months follow-up. Frailty status differed by SVI tertile (tertile 1: 26.8 %; tertile 2: 34.3 %; tertile 3: 43.4 %, p-value: <0.001). Adjusting for age, sex, and cancer type/stage, those living in neighborhoods in the highest SVI tertile had 6 % higher hazard of death (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.8, 1.4) and in the second-highest tertile had 8 % higher hazard of death (95 % CI: 0.9, 1.4) compared to those in the lowest tertile. This association may be driven by the SVI housing characteristics theme [tertile 2: hazard ratio (HR) 1.40 (95 % CI: 1.09, 1.79); tertile 3: HR 1.20 (95 % CI: 0.93, 1.55)].
We did not find a statistically significant association between SVI and survival among older adults with GI cancers. Prior evidence of associations between SVI and overall area-level mortality may not reflect individual-level mortality specific to older adults. Prior evidence of associations between SVI and individual-level frailty among older adults with GI cancers suggests SVI may confer greater risk on development of frailty, which could indirectly impact survival. SVI of at-risk areas may need consideration when designing solutions to improve frailty among older adults with GI cancers, which could have a subsequent positive impact on mortality.
老年成年人占胃肠道(GI)癌症病例的大多数。健康的社会决定因素,如邻里层面的社会脆弱性指数(SVI),与虚弱相关,而虚弱是死亡率的一个预测指标。社会脆弱性与生存率之间的关联研究较少。
我们评估了876名年龄≥60岁的GI癌症成年患者,这些患者在化疗前被纳入癌症与衰老恢复力评估(CARE)登记处。暴露因素是疾病控制与预防中心的SVI三分位数。SVI将普查区按脆弱性从低到高分别排在第0百分位至第100百分位之间。结局指标是生存率(从入组到随访结束)。使用Cox比例风险模型估计SVI与生存率之间的关联。
患者的中位年龄为69岁,58%为男性,22%为非西班牙裔黑人,30%患有结直肠癌,29%患有胰腺癌,70%患有III/IV期疾病。在中位17个月的随访中,约44%的参与者死亡。虚弱状态因SVI三分位数而异(第一三分位数:26.8%;第二三分位数:34.3%;第三三分位数:43.4%,p值:<0.001)。在调整年龄、性别和癌症类型/分期后,与处于最低SVI三分位数的人群相比,处于最高SVI三分位数社区的人群死亡风险高6%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.8,1.4),处于第二高SVI三分位数社区的人群死亡风险高8%(95%CI:0.9,1.4)。这种关联可能由SVI住房特征主题驱动[第二三分位数:风险比(HR)1.40(95%CI:1.09,1.79);第三三分位数:HR 1.20(95%CI:0.93,1.55)]。
我们未发现SVI与老年GI癌症患者生存率之间存在统计学上的显著关联。先前关于SVI与总体区域层面死亡率之间关联的证据可能无法反映老年成年人特有的个体层面死亡率。先前关于SVI与老年GI癌症患者个体层面虚弱之间关联的证据表明,SVI可能会使虚弱发生的风险更高,这可能间接影响生存率。在设计改善老年GI癌症患者虚弱状况的解决方案时,可能需要考虑高危地区的SVI,这可能随后对死亡率产生积极影响。