Chen Peiran, Mu Yi, Xie Yanxia, Wang Yanping, Liu Zheng, Li Mingrong, Liang Juan, Zhu Jun
National Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jul;21(3):e70000. doi: 10.1111/mcn.70000. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia in China from 2012 to 2021 and explore if LGA and macrosomia mediate the relationship between diabetes mellitus in pregnancy (DIP) and obstetric haemorrhage. The overall annual change rate (ACR) was calculated, and stratification analysis was performed. Mediation analysis assessed the influence of LGA and macrosomia in the association between DIP and obstetric haemorrhage. The nationwide prevalence of LGA and macrosomia was 15.8% and 6.8%, respectively. The ACR for LGA was 0.71% (95% CI, 0.66%-0.76%); pre-2016, -0.44% (95% CI, -0.63% to -0.25%); post-2016, -0.29% (95% CI, -0.39% to -0.19%). The ACR for macrosomia was -1.17% (95% CI, -1.24% to -1.09%); pre-2016, -0.73% (95% CI, -1.03% to -0.43%); post-2016, -2.42% (95% CI, -2.59% to -2.26%). In western and rural area, the ACR for LGA was 1.94% (95% CI, 1.84%-2.05%) and 1.81% (95% CI, 1.73%-1.89%), and LGA was increasing among these women in the post-2016 period. About 7.0% of pregnant women had DIP, and the LGA and macrosomia prevalences among women with DIP were 23.7% and 10.0%, respectively. In the mediation analysis, the total excess risk associated with DIP on obstetric haemorrhage was approximately 0.21 and the proportion mediated by LGA and macrosomia was 12.10% and 11.81%, respectively. In rural areas, the proportion mediated by LGA and macrosomia was amplified to 18.34% and 16.40%. Macrosomia rates declined steadily, but LGA rates increased slightly in disadvantaged areas. LGA and macrosomia mediated the association between DIP and obstetric haemorrhage, and the mediating effect intensified in rural regions. Addressing LGA warrants management for at-risk fetuses.
本研究旨在确定2012年至2021年中国大于胎龄儿(LGA)和巨大儿的患病率,并探讨LGA和巨大儿是否介导妊娠期糖尿病(DIP)与产科出血之间的关系。计算总体年变化率(ACR)并进行分层分析。中介分析评估LGA和巨大儿在DIP与产科出血关联中的影响。全国LGA和巨大儿的患病率分别为15.8%和6.8%。LGA的ACR为0.71%(95%CI,0.66%-0.76%);2016年前,为-0.44%(95%CI,-0.63%至-0.25%);2016年后,为-0.29%(95%CI,-0.39%至-0.19%)。巨大儿的ACR为-1.17%(95%CI,-1.24%至-1.09%);2016年前,为-0.73%(95%CI,-1.03%至-0.43%);2016年后,为-2.42%(95%CI,-2.59%至-2.26%)。在西部和农村地区,LGA的ACR分别为1.94%(95%CI,1.84%-2.05%)和1.81%(95%CI,1.73%-1.89%),2016年后这些地区的LGA患病率呈上升趋势。约7.0%的孕妇患有DIP,患有DIP的女性中LGA和巨大儿的患病率分别为23.7%和10.0%。在中介分析中,DIP与产科出血相关的总额外风险约为0.21,由LGA和巨大儿介导的比例分别为12.10%和11.81%。在农村地区,由LGA和巨大儿介导的比例分别扩大到18.34%和16.40%。巨大儿患病率稳步下降,但在贫困地区LGA患病率略有上升。LGA和巨大儿介导了DIP与产科出血之间的关联,且这种中介作用在农村地区更为明显。应对LGA需要对高危胎儿进行管理。