Ceccato Irene, Lecce Serena, Bischetti Luca, Mangiaterra Veronica, di San Pietro Chiara Barattieri, Cavallini Elena, Bambini Valentina
Department of Psychology, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara.
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia.
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1111/tops.12785.
While some aspects of pragmatic competence are known to decline with age, for metaphor skills the evidence is inconclusive, possibly due to heterogeneity in the assessment tools. Furthermore, the previous literature on age-related changes in pragmatic skills has rarely considered the role of Theory of Mind (ToM), which is described as one of the main factors affecting metaphor across theoretical and experimental studies in children and clinical populations. This study aimed at elucidating age-related differences in metaphor understanding and the interplay between metaphor skills and ToM in middle-aged and older adults with a fine-grained approach. Participants (n = 201, age range 54-93) completed tasks assessing ToM and metaphor understanding. On the one side, we used the Physical and Mental Metaphors task, to distinguish between different types of metaphor (physical, such as "Lifeguards are lizards," meaning that they lie in the sun, vs. mental, such as "Adolescents are pendulums," meaning that they are emotionally unstable) and different aspects of metaphor understanding, namely, accuracy in finding a link between topic and vehicle versus type of interpretation (from physical to psychological). On the other side, we analyzed two aspects of ToM skills: the accuracy in mental state understanding and the intentionality, defined as the degree of mental state attribution, assessed with the Strange Stories and the Animated Social Triangles task, respectively. Structural equation models indicated a decline in metaphor skills with advancing age. Furthermore, we found that ToM is involved in metaphor understanding in a specific fashion. While higher ToM accuracy explained better metaphor accuracy, higher ToM intentionality explained better performance in the interpretation of mental, but not physical, metaphors. These findings suggest that age-related differences in pragmatics extend to metaphor skills and that ToM plays a role in metaphor comprehension in older age, with a division of labor where the ability to understand what others think is key to spotting a metaphorical link, but the greater tendency to attribute mental states is what specifically helps when it comes to grasping the psychological nuances of a metaphor.
虽然已知语用能力的某些方面会随着年龄的增长而下降,但关于隐喻技能的证据尚无定论,这可能是由于评估工具的异质性所致。此外,先前关于语用技能与年龄相关变化的文献很少考虑心理理论(ToM)的作用,而心理理论在儿童和临床人群的理论与实验研究中被描述为影响隐喻的主要因素之一。本研究旨在采用一种细致入微的方法,阐明中年和老年人在隐喻理解方面与年龄相关的差异,以及隐喻技能与心理理论之间的相互作用。参与者(n = 201,年龄范围54 - 93岁)完成了评估心理理论和隐喻理解的任务。一方面,我们使用了物理和心理隐喻任务,以区分不同类型的隐喻(物理隐喻,如“救生员是蜥蜴”,意思是他们躺在阳光下;心理隐喻,如“青少年是钟摆”,意思是他们情绪不稳定)以及隐喻理解的不同方面,即找到主题与喻体之间联系的准确性与解释类型(从物理到心理)。另一方面,我们分析了心理理论技能的两个方面:心理状态理解的准确性和意向性,意向性被定义为心理状态归因的程度,分别通过“奇怪故事”和“动画社交三角”任务进行评估。结构方程模型表明,随着年龄的增长,隐喻技能会下降。此外,我们发现心理理论以一种特定的方式参与隐喻理解。虽然更高的心理理论准确性能更好地解释隐喻准确性,但更高的心理理论意向性能更好地解释在心理隐喻而非物理隐喻解释中的表现。这些发现表明,语用学中与年龄相关的差异延伸到了隐喻技能,并且心理理论在老年人的隐喻理解中发挥作用,存在一种分工,即理解他人想法的能力是发现隐喻联系的关键,但在理解隐喻的心理细微差别时,更大的心理状态归因倾向则特别有帮助。