Rasse Carina, Diehl Sandra, Terlutter Ralf
Department of English and American Studies, University of Klagenfurt.
Department of Media and Communications, University of Klagenfurt.
Health Commun. 2025 Feb 17:1-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2025.2464304.
Previous studies have investigated the effects of metaphors in health communication. Yet, relatively little attention has been given to variations in metaphor usage when people talk about a particular disease, and what functions these metaphors may have in different communication contexts. The aim of this paper is to study the effects of metaphors in the communication of Dry Eye Syndrome (DES), which has developed into a prevalent eye disease. A systematic metaphor analysis was applied to 15 extensive blog entries and 308 survey responses which reflect people's first-hand experiences on having dry eyes. The results showed that communication about DES is highly metaphorical and that metaphors vary in terms of underlying concepts (i.e., journey, war) and in their level of creativity in different communication contexts. When patients talk about treatments and experiences with doctors and about quality of life, conventional metaphors are overrepresented and patients often use metaphors related to a journey. When they talk about symptoms, creative metaphors are overrepresented and patients often refer to eyes/vision as objects. Paying attention to these variations provides deeper insights into how people experience and deal with DES. In a follow-up study, we asked DES patients ( = 66) which metaphors they consider particularly appropriate to describe their experience with DES. We found that personification and war-related metaphors got the highest appropriateness-ratings. Concluding, we discuss how the attention to metaphors might contribute to a more effective communication of DES in different communication contexts.
以往的研究探讨了隐喻在健康传播中的作用。然而,当人们谈论某一特定疾病时,对于隐喻使用的差异以及这些隐喻在不同传播语境中可能具有的功能,相对而言关注较少。本文的目的是研究隐喻在干眼症(DES)传播中的作用,干眼症已发展成为一种常见的眼部疾病。我们对15篇篇幅较长的博客文章和308份调查问卷回复进行了系统的隐喻分析,这些内容反映了人们干眼症的第一手体验。结果表明,关于干眼症的传播具有高度隐喻性,并且隐喻在潜在概念(如旅程、战争)以及在不同传播语境中的创造性水平方面存在差异。当患者与医生谈论治疗和经历以及生活质量时,传统隐喻占主导地位,患者经常使用与旅程相关的隐喻。当他们谈论症状时,创造性隐喻占主导地位,患者经常将眼睛/视力视为物体。关注这些差异能让我们更深入地了解人们如何体验和应对干眼症。在一项后续研究中,我们询问了66名干眼症患者,他们认为哪些隐喻最适合描述他们的干眼症经历。我们发现拟人化和与战争相关的隐喻获得了最高的适宜性评分。最后,我们讨论了关注隐喻如何可能有助于在不同传播语境中更有效地传播干眼症信息。