Department of languages, Linnaeus University, SE-35195, Växjö, Sweden.
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Box 201, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden.
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 25;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00557-6.
The significance of metaphors for the experience of cancer has been the topic of extensive previous research, with "Battle" and "Journey" metaphors standing out as key. Adaptation to the patient's use of metaphor is generally believed to be an important aspect of person-centered care, especially in palliative care. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of metaphors in blogs written in Swedish by people living with advanced cancer and explore possible patterns associated with individuals, age and gender.
The study is based on a dataset totaling 2,602,479 words produced some time during the period 2007-2016 by 27 individuals diagnosed with advanced cancer. Both qualitative and quantitative procedures were used, and the findings are represented as raw frequencies as well as normalized frequencies per 10,000 words. Our general approach was exploratory and descriptive. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze statistical significance.
Our results confirm the strong foothold of "Journey" and "Battle" metaphors. "Imprisonment" and "Burden" metaphors were also used by the majority of the individuals. The propensity to use metaphors when describing the cancer experience was found to differ extensively across the individuals. However, individuals were not found to opt for one conceptualization over the other but tended to draw on several different metaphor domains when conceptualizing their experience. Socio-demographic factors such as age or gender were not found to be strong predictors of metaphor choice in this limited study.
Using a range of different metaphors allows individuals with advanced cancer to highlight different aspects of their experience. The presence of metaphors associated with "Journey", "Battle", "Imprisonment" and "Burden" across individuals could be explained by the fact that the bloggers are part of a culturally consistent cohort, despite variations in age, sex and cancer form. Awareness of metaphors commonly used by patients can enhance health professionals' capacity to identify metaphorical patterns and develop a common language grounded in the patients' own metaphor use, which is an important requisite for person-centered palliative care.
隐喻对于癌症体验的意义一直是广泛研究的主题,其中“战斗”和“旅程”隐喻尤为突出。适应患者使用隐喻通常被认为是以人为本的护理的一个重要方面,特别是在姑息治疗中。本研究旨在调查瑞典语博客中晚期癌症患者使用隐喻的情况,并探讨与个体、年龄和性别相关的可能模式。
该研究基于一个由 27 名被诊断为晚期癌症的个体在 2007-2016 年期间产生的总词汇量为 2602479 个单词的数据集。本研究采用了定性和定量两种方法,研究结果用原始频率和每 10000 个单词的归一化频率表示。我们的总体方法是探索性和描述性的。采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验分析统计显著性。
研究结果证实了“旅程”和“战斗”隐喻的强大基础。大多数个体还使用了“监禁”和“负担”隐喻。发现个体在描述癌症体验时使用隐喻的倾向差异很大。然而,个体并没有选择一种概念化而不是另一种,而是倾向于在概念化他们的经验时借鉴几个不同的隐喻领域。在这项有限的研究中,年龄或性别等社会人口因素并不是隐喻选择的强有力预测因素。
使用一系列不同的隐喻可以让晚期癌症患者突出他们体验的不同方面。尽管存在年龄、性别和癌症类型的差异,但个体中存在与“旅程”、“战斗”、“监禁”和“负担”相关的隐喻,可以解释为博客作者是文化上一致的群体的一部分。了解患者常用的隐喻可以增强卫生专业人员识别隐喻模式的能力,并基于患者自己的隐喻使用发展共同语言,这是以人为本的姑息治疗的重要前提。