Dauber-Decker Katherine L, Feldstein David, Hess Rachel, Mann Devin, Kim Eun Ji, Gautam-Goyal Pranisha, Solomon Jeffrey, Khan Sundas, Malik Fatima, Xu Lynn, Huffman Ainsley, Smith Paul D, Halm Wendy, Yuroff Alice, Richardson Safiya
Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, 600 Community Drive, Suite 403, Manhasset, NY, 11030, United States, 1 5166001421.
Northwell Health, 2000 Marcus Avenue, Suite 300, New Hyde Park, NY, 11042, United States, 1 5166001421.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 18;9:e55316. doi: 10.2196/55316.
Usability testing is valuable for assessing a new tool or system's usefulness and ease-of-use. Several established methods of usability testing exist, including think-aloud testing. Although usability testing has been shown to be crucial for successful clinical decision support (CDS) tool development, it is often difficult to conduct across multisite development projects due to its time- and labor-intensiveness, cost, and the skills required to conduct the testing.
Our objective was to develop a new method of usability testing that would enable efficient acquisition and dissemination of results among multiple sites. We sought to address the existing barriers to successfully completing usability testing during CDS tool development.
We combined individual think-aloud testing and focus groups into one session and performed sessions serially across 4 sites (snowball group usability testing) to assess the usability of two CDS tools designed for use by nurses in primary and urgent care settings. We recorded each session and took notes in a standardized format. Each site shared feedback from their individual sessions with the other sites in the study so that they could incorporate that feedback into their tools prior to their own testing sessions.
The group testing and snowballing components of our new usability testing method proved to be highly beneficial. We identified 3 main benefits of snowball group usability testing. First, by interviewing several participants in a single session rather than individuals over the course of weeks, each site was able to quickly obtain their usability feedback. Second, combining the individualized think-aloud component with a focus group component in the same session helped study teams to more easily notice similarities in feedback among participants and to discuss and act upon suggestions efficiently. Third, conducting usability testing in series across sites allowed study teams to incorporate feedback based on previous sites' sessions prior to conducting their own testing.
Snowball group usability testing provides an efficient method of obtaining multisite feedback on newly developed tools and systems, while addressing barriers typically associated with traditional usability testing methods. This method can be applied to test a wide variety of tools, including CDS tools, prior to launch so that they can be efficiently optimized.
可用性测试对于评估新工具或系统的实用性和易用性很有价值。存在几种既定的可用性测试方法,包括出声思考测试。尽管可用性测试已被证明对成功开发临床决策支持(CDS)工具至关重要,但由于其时间和人力密集、成本以及进行测试所需的技能,在多地点开发项目中往往难以开展。
我们的目标是开发一种新的可用性测试方法,以便能够在多个地点高效获取和传播结果。我们试图解决在CDS工具开发过程中成功完成可用性测试的现有障碍。
我们将个体出声思考测试和焦点小组合并为一个环节,并在4个地点依次进行(滚雪球式小组可用性测试),以评估为初级和紧急护理环境中的护士设计的两种CDS工具的可用性。我们记录了每个环节,并以标准化格式做笔记。每个地点与研究中的其他地点分享其个体环节的反馈,以便他们能够在自己的测试环节之前将该反馈纳入其工具中。
我们新的可用性测试方法中的小组测试和滚雪球式部分被证明非常有益。我们确定了滚雪球式小组可用性测试的3个主要优点。首先,通过在单个环节中采访多名参与者,而不是在数周内采访个体,每个地点能够快速获得其可用性反馈。其次,在同一环节中将个性化的出声思考部分与焦点小组部分相结合,有助于研究团队更轻松地注意到参与者反馈中的相似之处,并有效地讨论建议并采取行动。第三,跨地点依次进行可用性测试使研究团队能够在进行自己的测试之前,根据先前地点的环节纳入反馈。
滚雪球式小组可用性测试提供了一种高效的方法,可获取关于新开发工具和系统的多地点反馈,同时解决通常与传统可用性测试方法相关的障碍。这种方法可应用于在各种工具(包括CDS工具)推出之前进行测试,以便能够对其进行有效优化。