Febres-Aldana Christopher A, Vojnic Morana, Odintsov Igor, Zhang Tom, Cheng Ryan, Beach Catherine Z, Lu Daniel, Mattar Marissa S, Gazzo Andrea M, Gili Leo, Harshan Manju, Ameri Ali, Machnicki Stephen, Xiao Xiuying, Lockwood William W, Zhou Xiao-Yan, Yao Qianlan, Drilon Alexander, Rekhtman Natasha, Shah Nameeta, Li Anqi, Liu Zebing, Yang Soo-Ryum, Davare Monika A, Ladanyi Marc, Somwar Romel
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cancer Discov. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):1141-1158. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0417.
MET fusions (MET-F) are oncogenic drivers that remain poorly characterized. Analysis of 56 MET-F-positive tumors from an institutional cohort of 91,119 patients (79,864 DNA sequencing plus 11,255 RNA sequencing) uncovered two forms of MET-F pathobiology. The first group featured 5' partners with homodimerization domains fused in-frame with the MET tyrosine kinase domain, primarily originated from translocations, frequently excluded MET exon 14, mediated oncogenesis through cytoplasmic aggregation and constitutive activation, and were markedly sensitive to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in preclinical models and patients with lung cancer. The second group lacked partner homodimerization motifs and retained MET transmembrane and extracellular domains. Their pathogenesis involved intrachromosomal rearrangements, resulting in partner selection for promoter hijacking and fusion allele amplification. Membrane-bound fusions were enriched in gliomas with receptor tyrosine kinase co-alterations. We provide a framework to comprehend the heterogeneous landscape of MET-Fs, supporting that fusion oncogenicity and MET TKI sensitivity are determined by structural topology and pathogenomic context.
MET fusions are primary drivers of tumor growth in multiple tumor types - lung cancer and gliomas - and can be effectively targeted with either type I (crizotinib, capmatinib, tepotinib, and savolitinib) or type II (cabozantinib) MET TKIs, with best responses in tumors harboring fusions with partner homodimerization.
MET融合(MET-F)是致癌驱动因素,其特征仍不清楚。对来自91119名患者的机构队列中的56个MET-F阳性肿瘤(79864个DNA测序加11255个RNA测序)进行分析,发现了两种MET-F病理生物学形式。第一组的特征是5'伙伴与同二聚化结构域与MET酪氨酸激酶结构域框内融合,主要起源于易位,经常排除MET外显子14,通过细胞质聚集和组成性激活介导肿瘤发生,并且在临床前模型和肺癌患者中对MET酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)明显敏感。第二组缺乏伙伴同二聚化基序,并保留了MET跨膜和细胞外结构域。它们的发病机制涉及染色体内重排,导致启动子劫持和融合等位基因扩增的伙伴选择。膜结合融合在具有受体酪氨酸激酶共改变的神经胶质瘤中富集。我们提供了一个框架来理解MET-F的异质性景观,支持融合致癌性和MET TKI敏感性由结构拓扑和致病基因组背景决定。
MET融合是多种肿瘤类型(肺癌和神经胶质瘤)中肿瘤生长的主要驱动因素,并且可以用I型(克唑替尼、卡马替尼、替泊替尼和赛沃替尼)或II型(卡博替尼)MET TKI有效靶向,在具有伙伴同二聚化融合的肿瘤中反应最佳。