Wang Ke, Huang Long, Yang Pu, Zhuo Yong, Che Lianqiang, Xu Shengyu, Hua Lun, Li Jian, Feng Bin, Fang Zhengfeng, Zhao Xilun, Jiang Xuemei, Lin Yan, Wu De
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of China, Ministry of Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Anim Nutr. 2024 Nov 2;20:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.09.004. eCollection 2025 Mar.
This study determined the available energy content, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients, and ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility of soybean meal (SBM) from different sources in non-gestating, non-lactating sows. In Exp. 1, 24 multiparous Landrace × Yorkshire (LY) sows (parity 3 to 5) were allotted to a replicated 12 × 3 Youden square design consisting of 12 diets and 3 periods. The 12 diets included 11 test diets containing SBM from different sources and a corn-based diet. Each period included a 5-d adaptation and a 5-d total fecal and urine collection. In Exp. 2, 8 multiparous LY sows (parity 3 to 5) were allotted to a replicated 4 × 3 Youden square design with 4 diets and 3 periods. The 4 diets included a nitrogen-free diet and 3 SBM diets (3 representative SBM samples were selected from Exp. 1). Our results showed that the coefficient of variation of ether extract, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber levels in 11 SBM samples were >20%. There were no differences in digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and the ATTD of gross energy, nitrogen, and neutral detergent fiber values between different SBM samples ( > 0.05). Additionally, no differences in AA digestibility were identified among the 3 representative SBM samples ( > 0.05). In conclusion, there were no differences in DE, ME, and AA digestibility between different SBM samples fed to multiparous non-gestating sows. When formulating diets for sows, it is important to consider the differences in the nutritional value of SBM at different physiological stages.
本研究测定了不同来源豆粕在非妊娠、非泌乳母猪中的有效能量含量、养分的表观全肠道消化率(ATTD)以及回肠氨基酸(AA)消化率。在试验1中,将24头经产长白×大白(LY)母猪(第3至第5胎)分配到一个重复的12×3尤登方设计中,该设计包括12种日粮和3个阶段。这12种日粮包括11种含有不同来源豆粕的试验日粮和一种玉米基础日粮。每个阶段包括5天的适应期和5天的粪便和尿液总收集期。在试验2中,将8头经产LY母猪(第3至第5胎)分配到一个重复的4×3尤登方设计中,该设计有4种日粮和3个阶段。这4种日粮包括一种无氮日粮和3种豆粕日粮(从试验1中选择3个有代表性的豆粕样本)。我们的结果表明,11个豆粕样本中乙醚提取物、粗纤维、中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维水平的变异系数>20%。不同豆粕样本之间的消化能(DE)、代谢能(ME)以及总能、氮和中性洗涤纤维值的ATTD没有差异(P>0.05)。此外,3个有代表性的豆粕样本之间的氨基酸消化率也没有差异(P>0.05)。总之,给经产非妊娠母猪饲喂不同豆粕样本时,DE、ME和氨基酸消化率没有差异。在为母猪配制日粮时,考虑不同生理阶段豆粕营养价值的差异很重要。