Flores Gabrielle P, Tamayo Reiner Lorenzo J, Leong Robert Neil F, Biglaen Christian Sergio M, Uy Kathleen Nicole T, Maglente Renee Rose O, Nuguid Marlex Jorome M, Alacapa Jason V
Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Innovations for Community Health, Inc., Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jan 31;59(2):33-40. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8950. eCollection 2025.
The Philippines faces challenges in the screening of tuberculosis (TB), one of them being the shortage in the health workforce who are skilled and allowed to screen TB. Deep learning neural networks (DLNNs) have shown potential in the TB screening process utilizing chest radiographs (CXRs). However, local studies on AI-based TB screening are limited. This study evaluated qXR3.0 technology's diagnostic performance for TB screening in Filipino adults aged 15 and older. Specifically, we evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of qXR3.0 compared to radiologists' impressions and determined whether it meets the World Health Organization (WHO) standards.
A prospective cohort design was used to perform a study on comparing screening and diagnostic accuracies of qXR3.0 and two radiologist gradings in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD). Subjects from two clinics in Metro Manila which had qXR 3.0 seeking consultation at the time of study were invited to participate to have CXRs and sputum collected. Radiologists' and qXR3.0 readings and impressions were compared with respect to the reference standard Xpert MTB/RiF assay. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated.
With 82 participants, qXR3.0 demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity with respect to the reference standard. There was a strong agreement between qXR3.0 and radiologists' readings as exhibited by the 0.7895 (between qXR 3.0 and CXRs read by at least one radiologist), 0.9362 (qXR 3.0 and CXRs read by both radiologists), and 0.9403 (qXR 3.0 and CXRs read as not suggestive of TB by at least one radiologist) concordance indices.
qXR3.0 demonstrated high sensitivity to identify presence of TB among patients, and meets the WHO standard of at least 70% specificity for detecting true TB infection. This shows an immense potential for the tool to supplement the shortage of radiologists for TB screening in the country. Future research directions may consider larger sample sizes to confirm these findings and explore the economic value of mainstream adoption of qXR 3.0 for TB screening.
菲律宾在结核病(TB)筛查方面面临挑战,其中之一是缺乏技术熟练且被允许进行结核病筛查的卫生人力。深度学习神经网络(DLNNs)在利用胸部X光片(CXRs)进行结核病筛查过程中显示出潜力。然而,基于人工智能的结核病筛查的本地研究有限。本研究评估了qXR3.0技术在15岁及以上菲律宾成年人结核病筛查中的诊断性能。具体而言,我们将qXR3.0与放射科医生的诊断结果进行比较,评估其特异性和敏感性,并确定它是否符合世界卫生组织(WHO)标准。
采用前瞻性队列设计,根据诊断准确性报告标准(STARD),对qXR3.0与两名放射科医生的分级的筛查和诊断准确性进行比较研究。邀请来自马尼拉大都会两家拥有qXR 3.0的诊所且在研究期间前来咨询的患者参与,收集其胸部X光片和痰液。将放射科医生和qXR3.0的读数及诊断结果与参考标准Xpert MTB/RiF检测进行比较。计算诊断准确性指标。
82名参与者中,qXR3.0相对于参考标准显示出100%的敏感性和72.7%的特异性。qXR3.0与放射科医生的读数之间存在高度一致性,一致性指数分别为0.7895(qXR 3.0与至少一名放射科医生读取的CXRs之间)、0.9362(qXR 3.0与两名放射科医生都读取的CXRs之间)和0.9403(qXR 3.0与至少一名放射科医生读取为不提示结核病的CXRs之间)。
qXR3.0在识别患者结核病方面表现出高敏感性,并且符合世界卫生组织检测真正结核病感染至少70%特异性的标准。这表明该工具在弥补该国结核病筛查放射科医生短缺方面具有巨大潜力。未来的研究方向可考虑更大样本量以证实这些发现,并探索将qXR 3.0用于结核病筛查的主流应用的经济价值。