Sun Xupeng, Qu Meijie, Rong Xi, Lv Mingxing, Zhao Yunbin, Yan Yunjun, Liu Lin, Sun Na, Yue Hua, Liu Min
Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jinan Dian Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd., Jinan, China.
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 4;16:1537783. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1537783. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to explore autoantibody clusters and their correlations with clinical features in 644 myasthenia gravis (MG) patients.
Medical records of 664 MG patients were reviewed. Five autoantibodies (AChR, MuSK, titin, RyR, and LRP4) were selected for cluster analysis. The various clinical manifestations were compared between clusters. Separate association analyses between individual autoantibodies and clinical manifestations as well as among different MGFA subtypes were also performed without prior clustering.
Two separate autoantibody clusters were identified, with significantly different clinical manifestations. Cluster 1 (485 patients) was characterized by higher proportions of RyR-, titin-, and AChR-, while cluster 2 (179 patients) had higher proportions of RyR+, titin+, and AChR+. Cluster 2 patients were older and had elevated QMG scores and odds of complications, particularly hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and eye conditions. Individual antibody analysis revealed that male cases were more likely to be AChR+ and titin+, and older age was associated with AChR+, RyR+, and titin+. Among MGFA subtypes, significant differences were detected in AChR, MuSK, titin, complications, thymoma, and hypertension. As MG severity increased from types I to V, AChR+, RyR+, and titin+ proportions peaked at stage IIa. MuSK+ patients were relatively rare and mostly present in the subtype b group. Type b patients had higher MuSK+ prevalence and increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease incidence rates than type a cases.
Overall, cluster 2 features were less favorable to patients. This study provides valuable insights into the clinical and autoantibody profiles of Chinese MG patients.
本研究旨在探讨644例重症肌无力(MG)患者的自身抗体簇及其与临床特征的相关性。
回顾了664例MG患者的病历。选择五种自身抗体(乙酰胆碱受体、肌肉特异性激酶、肌联蛋白、兰尼碱受体和低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白4)进行聚类分析。比较各簇之间的各种临床表现。还在未进行预先聚类的情况下,分别对单个自身抗体与临床表现以及不同MGFA亚型之间进行了关联分析。
识别出两个不同的自身抗体簇,其临床表现有显著差异。第1簇(485例患者)的特征是兰尼碱受体、肌联蛋白和乙酰胆碱受体阳性比例较高,而第2簇(179例患者)的兰尼碱受体、肌联蛋白和乙酰胆碱受体阳性比例更高。第2簇患者年龄较大且QMG评分升高,并发症几率增加,尤其是高血压、糖尿病、心血管和脑血管疾病以及眼部疾病。单个抗体分析显示,男性病例更可能为乙酰胆碱受体阳性和肌联蛋白阳性,年龄较大与乙酰胆碱受体阳性、兰尼碱受体阳性和肌联蛋白阳性相关。在MGFA亚型中,乙酰胆碱受体、肌肉特异性激酶、肌联蛋白、并发症、胸腺瘤和高血压存在显著差异。随着MG严重程度从I型增加到V型,乙酰胆碱受体阳性、兰尼碱受体阳性和肌联蛋白阳性比例在IIa期达到峰值。肌肉特异性激酶阳性患者相对较少,主要出现在b亚型组。与a亚型病例相比,b亚型患者肌肉特异性激酶阳性患病率更高,心血管和脑血管疾病发病率增加。
总体而言,第2簇特征对患者不利。本研究为中国MG患者的临床和自身抗体谱提供了有价值的见解。