• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唇裂修复模拟过程中的技术技能评估

Technical skills assessment during simulated cleft lip repair.

作者信息

Kaimi Pegi, Fisher David M, Yasabala Branavan, Wong Riff Karen W, Podolsky Dale J

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Apr;103:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.040. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.040
PMID:39970744
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cleft lip repair is a challenging procedure with a steep learning curve. A cleft lip simulator can augment the operating experience to shorten the learning curve. This study evaluated the efficacy of a high-fidelity cleft lip simulator using a newly developed cleft lip technical assessment tool.

METHODS

Four plastic surgery residents and 6 fellows performed 3 sequential cleft lip repairs. Three staff surgeons performed 1 cleft lip repair. Each procedure was video recorded and assessed by 3 staff cleft surgeons using a newly developed cleft lip technical assessment scale and a previously developed global rating scale. The reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) of the assessment scores was determined. The first simulation session was compared among participants to determine whether the scales and simulator could distinguish between skill level. Learning curves were determined using successive assessment scores among the trainees.

RESULTS

The average ICC for the cleft lip-specific and global scores were 0.72 (range 0.65-0.82) and 0.70 (range 0.60-0.79), respectively. All scale items demonstrated statistically significant interrater reliability. The staff surgeons significantly outperformed the trainees in the first simulation session for both assessment scores (p < 0.05). The trainees demonstrated improved performance after each session.

CONCLUSIONS

A cleft lip assessment scale was developed and found to be reliable at evaluating technical skill in simulated cleft lip repair. Repeated use of the cleft lip simulator improved performance in simulated cleft lip repair.

摘要

引言

唇裂修复手术具有挑战性,学习曲线较陡。唇裂模拟器可以增加手术经验以缩短学习曲线。本研究使用一种新开发的唇裂技术评估工具评估了高保真唇裂模拟器的效果。

方法

四名整形外科住院医师和六名进修医师依次进行了三次唇裂修复手术。三名主治外科医生进行了一次唇裂修复手术。每次手术均进行视频记录,并由三名唇裂主治外科医生使用新开发的唇裂技术评估量表和先前开发的整体评分量表进行评估。确定评估分数的可靠性(组内相关系数[ICC])。比较参与者之间的第一次模拟手术,以确定量表和模拟器是否能够区分技能水平。使用学员的连续评估分数确定学习曲线。

结果

唇裂特异性评分和整体评分的平均ICC分别为0.72(范围0.65 - 0.82)和0.70(范围0.60 - 0.79)。所有量表项目均显示出具有统计学意义的评分者间可靠性。在第一次模拟手术中,主治外科医生在两项评估分数上均显著优于学员(p < 0.05)。学员在每次手术后表现有所改善。

结论

开发了一种唇裂评估量表,发现其在评估模拟唇裂修复技术技能方面具有可靠性。重复使用唇裂模拟器可提高模拟唇裂修复的表现。

相似文献

1
Technical skills assessment during simulated cleft lip repair.唇裂修复模拟过程中的技术技能评估
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Apr;103:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.040. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Assessing Technical Performance and Determining the Learning Curve in Cleft Palate Surgery Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator.使用高保真腭裂模拟器评估腭裂手术的技术性能并确定学习曲线。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun;141(6):1485-1500. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004426.
3
Knowledge and Skills Acquisition by Plastic Surgery Residents through Digital Simulation Training: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial.整形外科学住院医师通过数字模拟训练获得知识和技能:一项前瞻性、随机、盲法试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):184e-192e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006375.
4
Incorporating Cleft Lip Simulation Into a "Bootcamp-Style" Curriculum.将唇裂模拟纳入“新兵训练营式”课程。
Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Feb 1;86(2):210-216. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002265.
5
High-Fidelity Cleft Simulation Maintains Improvements in Performance and Confidence: A Prospective Study.高保真腭裂模拟可维持手术表现和信心的提升:一项前瞻性研究。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Dec;80(12):1859-1867. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
6
A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial Comparing Digital Simulation to Textbook for Cleft Surgery Education.前瞻性、随机、盲法试验比较数字化模拟与教科书在腭裂手术教学中的应用。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):202-209. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005093.
7
Quantitative assessment of the learning curve for cleft lip repair using LC-CUSUM.使用LC-CUSUM对唇裂修复学习曲线进行定量评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Mar;47(3):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Teaching Unilateral Cleft lip Repair: Lessons from Simulation-Based Mining of Trainee Strengths and Performance Gaps.单侧唇裂修复术教学:基于模拟的学员优势和绩效差距挖掘的经验教训。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 May;61(5):834-843. doi: 10.1177/10556656221146736. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
9
Teaching Palatoplasty Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator.使用高保真腭裂模拟器进行腭裂修复术教学
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan;141(1):91e-98e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003957.
10
Evaluation of a high-fidelity cleft alveolar bone graft simulator.评价一种高仿真牙槽裂植骨模拟模型。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jun;93:269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.034. Epub 2024 Apr 15.