van Geffen Eline G M, Sluckin Tania C, Witte Marnix G, Hazen Sanne-Marije J A, Peters Femke P, Intven Martijn P W, Tanis Pieter J, Kusters Miranda, Marijnen Corrie A M
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Treatment and Quality of Life, Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):e339-e349. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
In rectal cancer, accurate delineation is crucial for patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes to minimize lateral local recurrence risk. This study aims to evaluate interphysician variation in delineation of the lateral compartments, and the impact of training and implementation of standardized delineation protocols.
Twenty-three radiation oncologists from 15 institutes delineated the clinical target volume (CTV) on computed tomography scan in 1 example of a patient with rectal cancer. Parallel to this, the national consensus guideline was updated. Participating radiation oncologists completed an e-learning and online training session. Subsequently, 12 radiation oncologists redelineated the same case. Variation was measured with the Dice score and 95% Hausdorff distance.
Considerable interphysician variation was present before guideline distribution; and larger in the anterior compartment than the posterior compartment (Dice score 0.66 vs 0.80, P < .01). After training, there was a significant improvement in 95% Hausdorff distance for the lateral compartments together (0.71 vs 1.02, P = .02), but not in Dice score (0.76 vs 0.78, P = .31), and neither for the anterior and posterior compartment separately. Whereas delineation variation in the ventral and lateral sides decreased, the variation in the caudal side of the anterior compartment increased.
Substantial delineation variation in CTV of the lateral compartments in rectal cancer cases exists. This can be reduced by implementation of a delineation guideline with clear anatomic borders and subsequent training. Despite reduction in 95% Hausdorff distance, there is still need for further improvement in specific areas to assure adequate delineation.
在直肠癌中,对于侧方淋巴结肿大的患者,精确勾画至关重要,以尽量降低侧方局部复发风险。本研究旨在评估医师之间在侧方区域勾画方面的差异,以及标准化勾画方案的培训和实施效果。
来自15家机构的23名放射肿瘤学家在1例直肠癌患者的计算机断层扫描上勾画临床靶区(CTV)。与此同时,更新了国家共识指南。参与的放射肿瘤学家完成了在线学习和在线培训课程。随后,12名放射肿瘤学家重新勾画了同一病例。采用Dice评分和95%豪斯多夫距离来测量差异。
在指南发布前,医师之间存在相当大的差异;前侧区域的差异大于后侧区域(Dice评分0.66对0.80,P <.01)。培训后,侧方区域的95%豪斯多夫距离有显著改善(0.71对1.02,P =.02),但Dice评分没有改善(0.76对0.78,P =.31),前侧和后侧区域单独来看也没有改善。虽然腹侧和外侧的勾画差异减小了,但前侧区域尾侧的差异增加了。
直肠癌病例中侧方区域CTV的勾画存在很大差异。通过实施具有清晰解剖边界的勾画指南并随后进行培训,可以减少这种差异。尽管95%豪斯多夫距离有所减小,但仍需要在特定区域进一步改进以确保充分的勾画。