Gogal Robert M, Holladay Steven David
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Feb 5;12:1526980. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1526980. eCollection 2025.
We suggest an objective ranking formula that has wide national and international application. The new formula is presented with U.S. Colleges of Veterinary Medicine as an example. Methods used by ranking agencies differ, as do the ranks they generate. In some instances, relatively narrow information is collected from a limited number of polled contributors, raising questions about strength and validity of the generated ranks.
A new formula-based weighted model for ranking of veterinary colleges is proposed. Numbers fed into the formula parameters, for instance teaching hospital case load, faculty number and research expenditures, derive from real and measurable qualities of each college and drive an objective final ranking score for each veterinary college. This formula is designed to be readily modified within and beyond the veterinary profession.
The new ranking system works from calculations that are straightforward and transparent with little room for subjective interpretation. It is designed to provide a rigorous and defendable institutional rank for all veterinary colleges.
The new ranking system is designed to be readily adaptable within veterinary colleges as the profession changes, as well as to academic institutions with focuses other than veterinary medicine. The goal is to provide a new model that is useful for objective comparisons.
我们提出了一种具有广泛国内和国际应用的客观排名公式。以美国兽医学院为例介绍了这个新公式。排名机构使用的方法各不相同,其产生的排名也不同。在某些情况下,从有限数量的被调查贡献者那里收集到的信息相对有限,这引发了对所生成排名的力度和有效性的质疑。
提出了一种基于公式的兽医学院排名加权模型。输入公式参数的数字,例如教学医院病例量、教师数量和研究支出,来自每所学院真实且可衡量的特质,并得出每所兽医学院的客观最终排名分数。该公式设计为可在兽医专业内外轻松修改。
新的排名系统基于直接且透明的计算,几乎没有主观解释的空间。它旨在为所有兽医学院提供一个严谨且可辩护的机构排名。
新的排名系统设计为在兽医专业发生变化时可在兽医学院内部轻松调整,也适用于除兽医学之外的其他学术机构。目标是提供一个有助于进行客观比较的新模型。