Suppr超能文献

推进职业治疗范围综述:提高质量和方法严谨性的建议。

Advancing occupational therapy scoping reviews: Recommendations to enhance quality and methodological rigour.

作者信息

Brown Ted, Gustafsson Louise, McKinstry Carol, Robinson Luke

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University - Nathan Campus, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Feb;72(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70003.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Scoping reviews are an increasingly popular methodological approach to collate evidence and synthesise knowledge in many fields including occupational therapy. However, many are published with potential methodological weaknesses. To address this issue, nine methodological recommendations that authors could adopt to improve the quality and rigour of published scoping reviews are proposed based on the authors' opinions and the published evidence.

OVERVIEW

It is suggested that when authors are completing a scoping review, they can consider completing one or more of the following methodological guidelines: (1) refer to the Levac et al.'s (2010) scoping review recommendations, the JBI Scoping Review Protocol, and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist as methodological guides; (2) include grey literature as a standard component search strategy approach; (3) include thesis and dissertations as recognised sources of evidence; (4) apply a recognised research methodology critical appraisal/quality assessment tools and scales to evidence selected for inclusion in scoping reviews; (5) assign a level of evidence (LoE) framework to the selected evidence; (6) apply a recognised qualitative knowledge syntheses approach to the data extracted; (7) report the steps taken to ensure the trustworthiness of the qualitative knowledge synthesis approach used; (8) include consumer, stakeholder and community consultation; and (9) apply a scoping review-specific critical appraisal/quality assessment tool as a quality assurance activity. The authors are not proposing that the nine recommendations are mandatory, but instead they are methodological guidelines that scoping review authors can incorporate if they choose.

CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Consumers and community members were not involved in the writing of the manuscript.

CONCLUSION

Adopting the suggested methodological recommendations as a regular part of completing occupational therapy-related scoping reviews will increase their quality, precision, and rigour.

摘要

引言

范围综述是一种在包括职业治疗在内的许多领域中越来越受欢迎的方法,用于整理证据和综合知识。然而,许多范围综述在发表时存在潜在的方法学弱点。为了解决这个问题,基于作者的观点和已发表的证据,提出了九条作者可以采用的方法学建议,以提高已发表范围综述的质量和严谨性。

概述

建议作者在完成范围综述时,可以考虑遵循以下一项或多项方法学指南:(1)参考莱瓦克等人(2010年)的范围综述建议、JBI范围综述方案以及范围综述的PRISMA扩展清单(PRISMA-ScR)作为方法学指南;(2)将灰色文献纳入标准的文献检索策略方法;(3)将学位论文作为公认的证据来源;(4)对选定纳入范围综述的证据应用公认的研究方法批判性评价/质量评估工具和量表;(5)为选定的证据分配证据等级框架;(6)对提取的数据应用公认的定性知识综合方法;(7)报告为确保所使用的定性知识综合方法的可信度而采取的步骤;(8)纳入消费者、利益相关者和社区咨询;(9)应用特定于范围综述的批判性评价/质量评估工具作为质量保证活动。作者并非提议这九条建议是强制性的,而是这些方法学指南可供范围综述作者根据自己的选择纳入其中。

消费者和社区参与

消费者和社区成员未参与本文的撰写。

结论

将建议的方法学建议作为完成职业治疗相关范围综述的常规部分,将提高其质量、准确性和严谨性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9dd/11842175/d35cae3dbaac/AOT-72-0-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验