• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症和脓毒性休克输血的最佳血红蛋白阈值:一项回顾性分析。

Optimal hemoglobin threshold for blood transfusions in sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Permpikul Chairat, Tanksinmankhong Jakpanee, Tongyoo Surat, Naorungroj Thummaporn, Viarasilpa Tanuwong, Karaketklang Khemajira

机构信息

Division of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03889-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-025-03889-4
PMID:39979754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12009219/
Abstract

Transfusions of red blood cells (RBCs) are crucial for improving tissue oxygenation in anemic patients with sepsis. Nevertheless, the debate continues over the ideal hemoglobin level for transfusions. This study aimed to assess the impact of different hemoglobin levels on the outcomes of patients with sepsis who received transfusions. This retrospective analysis included adult patients with sepsis treated in the general medical ward and intensive care unit at a University affiliate hospital. Patients needing RBC transfusions were included. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. From March 2018 to January 2022, 806 patients were studied. Of these, 480 (59.6%) were transfused at hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL ("liberal group"), while 326 (40.4%) received RBC transfusions when their hemoglobin was < 7 g/dL ("restrictive group"). Mean hemoglobin levels at transfusion were 8.1 ± 0.8 g/dL and 6.3 ± 0.8 g/dL for each group, respectively(P < 0.001). On day 28, the liberal group had a mortality rate of 51.2% (246 patients), compared to 59.2% (193 patients) in the restrictive group (Odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.98, P = 0.031). Adjusted comparisons showed 46.8% mortality in the liberal group (141/301patients) versus 59.3% in the restrictive group (178/300patients) at 28 days (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed transfusion at hemoglobin 7-9 g/dL as an independent variable linked to lower 28-day mortality (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99, P = 0.042). Other factors correlated with 28-day mortality were platelet counts ≤ 150 × 10/µL, albumin ≤ 2.5 g/dL, shock, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy. This retrospective study suggests that RBC transfusion at hemoglobin levels of 7-9 g/dL associates with lower 28-day mortality in sepsis patients compared to transfusion at hemoglobin levels below 7 g/dL.Clinical trial registrationThe study was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (identification number TCTR20231003003). ( https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20231003003 ).

摘要

输注红细胞(RBC)对于改善脓毒症贫血患者的组织氧合至关重要。然而,关于输血的理想血红蛋白水平的争论仍在继续。本研究旨在评估不同血红蛋白水平对接受输血的脓毒症患者结局的影响。这项回顾性分析纳入了在一所大学附属医院的普通内科病房和重症监护病房接受治疗的成年脓毒症患者。纳入需要输注红细胞的患者。主要结局是28天死亡率。2018年3月至2022年1月,共研究了806例患者。其中,480例(59.6%)在血红蛋白水平为7 - 9 g/dL时接受输血(“宽松组”),而326例(40.4%)在血红蛋白<7 g/dL时接受红细胞输血(“严格组”)。每组输血时的平均血红蛋白水平分别为8.1±0.8 g/dL和6.3±0.8 g/dL(P<0.001)。在第28天,宽松组的死亡率为51.2%(246例患者),而严格组为59.2%(193例患者)(优势比[OR] 0.88,95%置信区间[CI] 0.79 - 0.98,P = 0.031)。校正后的比较显示,在第28天,宽松组的死亡率为46.8%(141/301例患者),而严格组为59.3%(178/300例患者)(OR 0.78,95% CI 0.66 - 0.92,P = 0.002)。多变量分析显示,血红蛋白7 - 9 g/dL时输血是与较低28天死亡率相关的独立变量(OR 0.70,95% CI 0.49 - 0.99,P = 0.042)。与28天死亡率相关的其他因素包括血小板计数≤150×10/µL、白蛋白≤2.5 g/dL、休克、机械通气和肾脏替代治疗。这项回顾性研究表明,与血红蛋白水平低于7 g/dL时输血相比,血红蛋白水平为7 - 9 g/dL时输注红细胞与脓毒症患者较低的28天死亡率相关。临床试验注册该研究已在泰国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号TCTR20231003003)。(https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20231003003)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/c9a8d0a63fa5/11739_2025_3889_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/62e50205d33b/11739_2025_3889_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/37f8a293a2c1/11739_2025_3889_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/c9a8d0a63fa5/11739_2025_3889_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/62e50205d33b/11739_2025_3889_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/37f8a293a2c1/11739_2025_3889_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a41/12009219/c9a8d0a63fa5/11739_2025_3889_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal hemoglobin threshold for blood transfusions in sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective analysis.脓毒症和脓毒性休克输血的最佳血红蛋白阈值:一项回顾性分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03889-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Benefits and harms of red blood cell transfusions in patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染性休克患者红细胞输血的益处与危害
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
3
Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.脓毒症或感染性休克患者的自由输血与限制输血策略:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 25;23(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2543-1.
4
The association of red blood cell transfusion with mortality in pediatric patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock: A single-center retrospective cohort study.红细胞输注与脓毒症、严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克患儿死亡率的关联:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2025 Feb;32(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2024.12.002. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
5
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值指导红细胞输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
6
Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值及指导异体红细胞输血的其他策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 12;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub4.
7
Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients: The Transfusion Requirements in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients Randomized Controlled Trial.重症肿瘤患者的宽松与限制性输血策略:重症肿瘤患者输血需求随机对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):766-773. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002283.
8
Red blood cell transfusion thresholds in pediatric patients with sepsis.儿科脓毒症患者的红细胞输血阈值。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;12(5):512-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181fe344b.
9
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support.对于接受强化化疗或放疗或两者联合治疗、有或没有造血干细胞支持的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,采用限制性与宽松性红细胞输血策略的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 27;1(1):CD011305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub2.
10
Hemoglobin levels and blood transfusion in patients with sepsis in Internal Medicine Departments.内科脓毒症患者的血红蛋白水平与输血情况
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1882-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Liberal transfusion strategies reduce sepsis risk and improve neurological recovery in acute brain injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.宽松输血策略可降低急性脑损伤患者的败血症风险并改善神经功能恢复:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2025 May 6;29(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05397-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology and Burden of Sepsis at Thailand's Largest University-Based National Tertiary Referral Center during 2019.2019年泰国最大的国立大学三级转诊中心的脓毒症流行病学及负担情况
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;11(7):899. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070899.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
3
Management and prevention of anemia (acute bleeding excluded) in adult critical care patients.
成年危重症患者贫血(不包括急性出血)的管理与预防
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Oct;39(5):655-664. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
4
Transfusion-associated circulatory overload and transfusion-related acute lung injury.输血相关循环超负荷和输血相关急性肺损伤。
Blood. 2019 Apr 25;133(17):1840-1853. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-860809. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
Microcirculation and red cell transfusion in patients with sepsis.脓毒症患者的微循环与红细胞输注
Transfus Apher Sci. 2017 Dec;56(6):900-905. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
6
Transfusion of Red Blood Cells to Patients with Sepsis.给脓毒症患者输注红细胞
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Sep 11;18(9):1946. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091946.
7
Red blood cell transfusion in the resuscitation of septic patients with hematological malignancies.红细胞输注在伴有血液系统恶性肿瘤的脓毒症患者复苏中的应用
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0292-3. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients: The Transfusion Requirements in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients Randomized Controlled Trial.重症肿瘤患者的宽松与限制性输血策略:重症肿瘤患者输血需求随机对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):766-773. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002283.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Impact of transfusion on patients with sepsis admitted in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.输血对重症监护病房脓毒症患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0226-5. Epub 2017 Jan 4.