Suppr超能文献

职业女性A型行为量表的效度。

The validity of type A behavior scales for employed women.

作者信息

Meininger J C

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(5):375-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90133-x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the validity of the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS) and the Framingham Type A Scale (FTAS) for employed women using structured interview ratings (SI) as the validating criterion. The sample consisted of 149 white females ages 30-42 who were employed full time. Forty-five percent were classified as Type A. The JAS Type A Scale provided better agreement with the SI (57%) than the FTAS (49%). Eleven items from all four scales of the JAS in combination with four FTAS items were identified by discriminant analysis. Using the resulting equation, 76.5% of the women were classified correctly as Type A or not Type A. It was concluded that neither the standardized version of the JAS Type A Scale nor the FTAS has a satisfactory degree of concurrent validity for measuring this behavior pattern in employed women. Investigators are cautioned against using either instrument to measure Type A behavior in women without recognition of their limitations.

摘要

本研究的目的是,以结构化访谈评分(SI)作为验证标准,检验詹金斯活动调查(JAS)和弗雷明汉A型量表(FTAS)对职业女性的有效性。样本包括149名年龄在30至42岁之间的全职工作的白人女性。45%被归类为A型。JAS A型量表与SI的一致性(57%)高于FTAS(49%)。通过判别分析确定了JAS所有四个量表中的11个项目与FTAS的4个项目的组合。使用所得方程,76.5%的女性被正确分类为A型或非A型。得出的结论是,JAS A型量表的标准化版本和FTAS在测量职业女性的这种行为模式时,都没有令人满意的同时效度。告诫研究人员,在未认识到其局限性的情况下,不要使用任何一种工具来测量女性的A型行为。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验