Mammadli Tural, Call Jarrod, Holloway Brendon T, Whitfield Darren L, Walls N Eugene
School of Social Work, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
School of Social Work & Criminal Justice, University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
Int J Transgend Health. 2024 Oct 14;26(1):198-214. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2024.2415681. eCollection 2025.
Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) persons' healthcare experiences and related transition decisions have received increasing attention in recent years. Growing literature indicates gender non-affirming practices, such as gender identity conversion efforts (GICE), are harmful for the wellbeing of TNB persons. Yet, how exposure to GICE is linked to transition related decisions among TNB persons remains unexplored. This study examines links between GICE and TNB persons' transition decisions and identity exploration, using a conceptual framework that distinguishes adaptive transition decisions (e.g. transition interruptions due to interpersonal coercion) from identity-related transition decisions.
This study is a secondary data analysis of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey ( = 27,630). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to examine the relationship between GICE and transition decisions among TNB persons while controlling for demographic covariates.
Overall, 13.5% of TNB participants experienced GICE. Participants interrupted their transition due to interpersonal coercion (4.9%), structural factors (2.0%), and identity-related factors (0.4%). Participants with GICE exposure were more likely to report interrupting their transition due to interpersonal coercion than not interrupting their transition. However, GICE-exposed participants did not have a higher chance of identity-related transition interruptions than no interruptions.
These findings point to a potentially harmful role GICE may play in the transition decisions of TNB persons. Our analysis adds to evidence indicating the need for banning GICE and calls for a more nuanced understanding, recognition, and respect for TNB persons' non-linear transitioning trajectories. Otherwise, we risk vilifying gender-affirming practices and pathologizing adaptive transitioning decisions of TNB persons.
跨性别者和非二元性别者(TNB)的医疗保健经历及相关转变决定近年来受到了越来越多的关注。越来越多的文献表明,不认可性别的做法,如性别认同转变努力(GICE),对TNB者的福祉有害。然而,接触GICE如何与TNB者的转变相关决定相联系仍未得到探索。本研究使用一个概念框架,将适应性转变决定(如因人际胁迫导致的转变中断)与身份相关的转变决定区分开来,来考察GICE与TNB者的转变决定和身份探索之间的联系。
本研究是对2015年美国跨性别者调查(n = 27,630)的二次数据分析。进行多项逻辑回归以检验GICE与TNB者的转变决定之间的关系,同时控制人口统计学协变量。
总体而言,13.5%的TNB参与者经历过GICE。参与者因人际胁迫(4.9%)、结构因素(2.0%)和身份相关因素(0.4%)而中断转变。接触过GICE的参与者比未中断转变的参与者更有可能报告因人际胁迫而中断转变。然而,接触过GICE的参与者与未中断转变的参与者相比,因身份相关因素导致转变中断的可能性并没有更高。
这些发现表明GICE可能在TNB者的转变决定中发挥潜在的有害作用。我们的分析补充了证据,表明有必要禁止GICE,并呼吁对TNB者非线性的转变轨迹有更细致入微的理解、认可和尊重。否则,我们有可能诋毁肯定性别的做法,并将TNB者适应性的转变决定视为病态。