Suppr超能文献

利用静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差能否改善心源性休克患者的预后?一项叙述性综述。

Can utilization of the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference improve patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock? A narrative review.

作者信息

Hørsdal Oskar Kjærgaard

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, N, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Jan 30;50:100504. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100504. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition with high mortality, characterized by reduced cardiac output (CO) and tissue hypoperfusion, despite advancements in treatment. Traditional hemodynamic markers like CO measurements, monitoring of mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂) and lactate levels have limitations, particularly in detecting microcirculatory dysfunction. The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference (V-A PCO₂ gap, also known as P(V-A)CO and delta PCO or ∆PCO) has been established as a sensitive marker of tissue perfusion and CO adequacy in septic shock but lacks extensive exploration in CS. This narrative review evaluates the possible uses of V-A PCO₂ gap in contemporary management of CS. Based on the available literature, it elucidates how the V-A PCO gap may offer valuable insight into tissue perfusion and CO adequacy in patients with CS. Elevated V-A PCO₂ gaps may reflect impaired clearance of CO₂ due to reduced CO and tissue hypoxia, serving as a reliable early indicator of circulatory failure. Integrating V-A PCO₂ gap monitoring into contemporary hemodynamic assessments holds potential to improve clinical decision-making, enabling more timely interventions and better stratification of patients at risk of deterioration. The sparse evidence suggests an association between elevated V-A PCO₂ gaps and poor outcomes in cardiac patients, including increased mortality and prolonged ventilation needs. Further research is needed to validate the use of this marker in CS and explore its potential to enhance treatment protocols by providing a more nuanced understanding of tissue-level perfusion, especially when macrocirculatory function appears normalized.

摘要

心源性休克(CS)是一种死亡率很高的危急病症,其特征是尽管治疗有所进展,但心输出量(CO)降低且组织灌注不足。传统的血流动力学指标,如CO测量、混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO₂)监测和乳酸水平,都有局限性,特别是在检测微循环功能障碍方面。静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差值(V-A PCO₂差值,也称为P(V-A)CO、δPCO或∆PCO)已被确立为脓毒性休克中组织灌注和CO充足性的敏感指标,但在CS中缺乏广泛研究。本叙述性综述评估了V-A PCO₂差值在CS当代管理中的可能用途。基于现有文献,阐明了V-A PCO差值如何可能为CS患者的组织灌注和CO充足性提供有价值的见解。升高的V-A PCO₂差值可能反映由于CO降低和组织缺氧导致的CO₂清除受损,可作为循环衰竭的可靠早期指标。将V-A PCO₂差值监测纳入当代血流动力学评估中,有可能改善临床决策,实现更及时的干预,并更好地对有病情恶化风险的患者进行分层。稀少的证据表明,升高的V-A PCO₂差值与心脏病患者的不良预后相关,包括死亡率增加和通气需求延长。需要进一步研究来验证该指标在CS中的应用,并通过更细致地了解组织水平灌注来探索其增强治疗方案的潜力,尤其是在大循环功能似乎正常化时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292d/11840508/305e5b45ee3a/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Can utilization of the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference improve patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock? A narrative review.
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Jan 30;50:100504. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100504. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Use of venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference to guide resuscitation therapy in septic shock.
World J Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 4;5(1):47-56. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.47.
4
CO gap changes compared with cardiac output changes in response to intravenous volume expansion and/or vasopressor therapy in septic shock.
South Afr J Crit Care. 2024 Apr 23;40(1):e652. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2024.v40i1.652. eCollection 2024.
5
[Research progress of diagnostic and therapeutic value of carbon dioxide-derived indicators in patients with sepsis].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):435-440. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240122-00074.
6
Biochemical markers for clinical monitoring of tissue perfusion.
Mol Cell Biochem. 2021 Mar;476(3):1313-1326. doi: 10.1007/s11010-020-04019-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in the resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review.
Med Intensiva. 2017 Oct;41(7):401-410. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 May 16.
10
Hemodynamic management of cardiovascular failure by using PCO(2) venous-arterial difference.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Oct;26(5):367-74. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9381-x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

3
Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
4
Relationship between the mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide gradient and the cardiac index in acute pulmonary embolism.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):493-500. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae031.
6
Microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiogenic shock.
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 May 6;13(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01130-z.
7
Does veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient provide an adequate estimation of cardiac index in pulmonary hypertension?
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 Jan 27;12(1):38-47. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac139.
9
Toward a Broader Characterization of Macro- and Microcirculatory Uncoupling in Cardiogenic Shock.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov 15;206(10):1192-1193. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1523ED.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验