• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合心源性休克:一种标准化分类、血流动力学定义和管理框架的建议。

Mixed Cardiogenic Shock: A Proposal for Standardized Classification, a Hemodynamic Definition, and Framework for Management.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (S.v.D., J.M.S.).

Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (J.P.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):1459-1468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069508. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069508
Abstract

The classification of cardiogenic shock (CS) has evolved from a singular cold-and wet-hemodynamic profile. Data from registries and clinical trials have contributed to a broader recognition that although all patients with CS have insufficient cardiac output leading to end organ hypoperfusion, there is considerable variability in CS acuity, underlying etiologies, volume status, and systemic vascular resistance. Mixed CS can be broadly categorized as . Mixed CS states are now the second leading cause of shock in contemporary coronary intensive care units, but there is little high-quality evidence to guide routine care, and there are no standardized classification frameworks or well-established hemodynamic definitions. This primer summarizes the current epidemiology and proposes a classification framework and invasive hemodynamic parameters to guide categorization that could be applied to help better phenotype patients captured in registries and trials, as well as guide management of mixed CS states.

摘要

心原性休克(CS)的分类已经从单一的冷湿性血流动力学特征发展而来。来自登记处和临床试验的数据有助于更广泛地认识到,尽管所有 CS 患者的心脏输出量均不足,导致终末器官灌注不足,但 CS 的严重程度、潜在病因、容量状态和全身血管阻力存在很大差异。混合 CS 大致可分为:混合型 CS 目前是当代冠心病重症监护病房中休克的第二大主要原因,但几乎没有高质量的证据来指导常规护理,也没有标准化的分类框架或成熟的血流动力学定义。本概述总结了目前的流行病学,并提出了一种分类框架和有创血流动力学参数来指导分类,这有助于更好地对登记处和试验中所捕获的患者进行表型分析,并指导混合 CS 状态的治疗。

相似文献

1
Mixed Cardiogenic Shock: A Proposal for Standardized Classification, a Hemodynamic Definition, and Framework for Management.混合心源性休克:一种标准化分类、血流动力学定义和管理框架的建议。
Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):1459-1468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069508. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Hemodynamics of Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克的血流动力学
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2017 Jul;6(3):359-371. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2017.03.006.
3
Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.当代心脏重症监护病房中休克的流行病学
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005618. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005618.
4
Epidemiology of cardiogenic shock using the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC) consensus definitions.使用 Shock Academic Research Consortium(SHARC)共识定义的心源性休克的流行病学。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 Oct 28;13(10):709-714. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae098.
5
Current evidence in the diagnosis and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome.目前在急性冠状动脉综合征并发心原性休克的诊断和处理中的证据。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 24;22(3):691-715. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2203078.
6
Association of Hemometabolic Trajectory and Mortality: Insights From the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry.血液代谢轨迹与死亡率的关联:来自心原性休克工作组注册研究的新见解。
J Card Fail. 2024 Oct;30(10):1196-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.019.
7
Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Advanced Chronic Heart Failure.晚期慢性心力衰竭患者的心源性休克
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-26. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-22.
8
SCAI shock classification in acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.急性心肌梗死中的 SCAI 休克分类:来自国家心源性休克倡议的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):1137-1142. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29139. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Hemodynamic monitoring and echocardiographic evaluation in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克的血流动力学监测和超声心动图评估。
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Oct;48(10):602-613. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
Management of Cardiogenic Shock in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心脏重症监护病房中心源性休克的管理
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):36-42. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-1-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of therapeutic hypothermia on cardiogenic shock outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗性低温对心源性休克结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01541-0.
2
Cardiogenic shock: diagnosis, phenotyping and management.心源性休克:诊断、分型及管理
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08049-y.
3
Can utilization of the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference improve patient outcomes in cardiogenic shock? A narrative review.
利用静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差能否改善心源性休克患者的预后?一项叙述性综述。
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Jan 30;50:100504. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100504. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的临床综述——血运重建、机械循环支持及其他。
Circ Rep. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):6-14. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141. eCollection 2025 Jan 10.