Downar James, Lapenskie Julie, Kanji Salmaan, Watpool Irene, Haines Jessica, Saeed Uzma, Porteous Rebecca, Polskaia Nadia, Burry Lisa, Himed Shuhira, Anderson Koby, Fox-Robichaud Alison
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2025 Feb 1;53(2):e257-e268. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006534. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
Surges in demand for sedatives for mechanical ventilation during the COVID-19 pandemic caused shortages of sedatives globally. Propranolol, a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker, has been associated with reduced agitation and sedative needs in observational studies. We aimed to test whether propranolol could reduce the dose of sedatives needed in mechanically ventilated patients.
Open-label randomized controlled trial.
Three academic hospitals.
Any nonparalyzed patient receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring high-dose sedatives.
Enteral propranolol 20-60 mg every 6 hours titrated to effect in the intervention group; all participants received protocol-titrated sedation with propofol or midazolam.
Mean change in 24 hours dose of sedative from baseline to day 3, proportion of sedation scores within target, and occurrence rate of adverse events. We enrolled a planned 72 patients between January 2021 and October 2022. Sixty-nine percent were male with a mean (sd) age of 54 years (15.91 yr). Most were admitted for COVID or non-COVID pneumonia. Intervention participants received propranolol for a mean of 10 days (mean daily dose, 90 mg). There was a significantly larger decrease in sedative dose from baseline (54% vs. 34%; p = 0.048) and more sedation assessments within target range (48% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001) in the intervention group compared with controls. There were no differences in mortality or adverse events.
Propranolol is an inexpensive drug that effectively lowered the need for sedatives in critically ill patients managed in the COVID-19 pandemic. Propranolol may help preserve limited supplies of sedatives while achieving target sedation.
在新冠疫情期间,机械通气患者对镇静剂的需求激增,导致全球镇静剂短缺。在观察性研究中,非选择性β肾上腺素能阻滞剂普萘洛尔与躁动减少及镇静需求降低有关。我们旨在测试普萘洛尔是否能减少机械通气患者所需的镇静剂剂量。
开放标签随机对照试验。
三家学术医院。
任何接受机械通气且需要高剂量镇静剂的非瘫痪患者。
干预组每6小时口服20 - 60毫克普萘洛尔,根据效果进行滴定;所有参与者均接受丙泊酚或咪达唑仑方案滴定镇静。
从基线到第3天镇静剂24小时剂量的平均变化、镇静评分在目标范围内的比例以及不良事件发生率。我们在2021年1月至2022年10月期间计划招募72名患者。69%为男性,平均(标准差)年龄为54岁(15.91岁)。大多数患者因新冠或非新冠肺炎入院。干预组参与者平均接受普萘洛尔治疗10天(平均每日剂量90毫克)。与对照组相比,干预组从基线开始镇静剂剂量显著下降幅度更大(54%对34%;p = 0.048),且更多镇静评估在目标范围内(48%对35%;p < 0.0001)。死亡率或不良事件方面无差异。
普萘洛尔是一种廉价药物,可有效降低新冠疫情期间危重症患者对镇静剂的需求。普萘洛尔可能有助于在实现目标镇静的同时,节省有限的镇静剂供应。