Vijayan Santhosh Thekkoot, Kattuparambil Jithin Joshy, Mani Praveen Thichur, Chirukandath Ravindran, Antony Manoj
Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Thrissur, India.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06827-2.
Skill training in medical education poses significant challenges. The traditional "see one, do one " approach is increasingly seen as outdated and inconsistent with modern adult learning principles. The 2019 Medical Council of India (MCI) skill training module recommends Peyton's four-step method for psychomotor skill training is designed for a 1:1 teacher-to-student ratio. However, this ratio is often impractical due to faculty shortages. Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has emerged as a potential solution, yet its effectiveness in teaching suturing skills using Peyton's method remains underexplored in our context.
To compare the effectiveness of PAL using Peyton's method with faculty-assisted learning (FAL) for surgical skill training and to evaluate students' perceptions of their learning experiences through validated feedback forms.
Sixty second-year MBBS students were randomized into two groups: one trained in basic suturing techniques (interrupted, vertical mattress, and continuous suturing) by peer tutors (PAL group) and the other by faculty members (FAL group). Peer tutors, trained by senior faculty members, used Peyton's four-step method to teach suturing techniques in a skill lab using manikins. Post-training, proficiency was assessed using a 15-point OSCE checklist, and students' perceptions were evaluated through a questionnaire.
Both groups achieved mean proficiency scores exceeding 80% (> 12/15) across all techniques, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Students in both groups reported high satisfaction with their training experience. Notably, the PAL group demonstrated significantly higher confidence in performing suturing both in the skill lab and on real patients (p < 0.05).
Peer-assisted learning is as effective as faculty-assisted learning for surgical skill training using Peyton's method. PAL can be recommended as a viable adjunct to traditional teaching methods for skill instruction.
Not applicable.
医学教育中的技能培训面临重大挑战。传统的“看一个,做一个”方法越来越被认为过时,且不符合现代成人学习原则。2019年印度医学委员会(MCI)技能培训模块推荐了佩顿四步法用于心理运动技能培训,该方法设计的师生比为1:1。然而,由于师资短缺,这个比例往往不切实际。同伴辅助学习(PAL)已成为一种潜在的解决方案,但在我们的环境中,其使用佩顿方法教授缝合技能的有效性仍未得到充分探索。
比较使用佩顿方法的同伴辅助学习(PAL)与教师辅助学习(FAL)在外科技能培训中的有效性,并通过经过验证的反馈表评估学生对其学习体验的看法。
60名医学学士二年级学生被随机分为两组:一组由同伴导师培训基本缝合技术(间断缝合、垂直褥式缝合和连续缝合)(PAL组),另一组由教师培训(FAL组)。同伴导师由资深教师培训,在技能实验室使用人体模型,采用佩顿四步法教授缝合技术。培训后,使用15分的客观结构化临床考试清单评估熟练程度,并通过问卷评估学生的看法。
两组在所有技术上的平均熟练得分均超过80%(>12/15),两组之间无统计学显著差异。两组学生对他们的培训经历都表示高度满意。值得注意的是,PAL组在技能实验室和真实患者身上进行缝合时表现出明显更高的信心(p<0.05)。
在使用佩顿方法进行外科技能培训方面,同伴辅助学习与教师辅助学习一样有效。PAL可被推荐为技能教学传统教学方法的可行辅助手段。
不适用。