• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定同伴辅助学习在医学教育中的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Determining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Guraya Salman Y, Abdalla Mohamed E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

College of Medicine & Medical Education Center, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 May 30;15(3):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.002
PMID:32647511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7336023/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite the popularity of peer-assisted learning (PAL), existing literature has not shown enough evidence that can validate its impact on students' active learning. This meta-analysis aims to quantitatively analyse the effectiveness of PAL in medical education.

METHODS

We searched selected databases using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms 'peer-assisted', 'learning', 'active learning', 'teaching strategy', 'peer mentoring', and 'peer instructions' for full-text English language studies with a pre-post design. Following a systematic protocol, we selected 11 articles for final analysis. A meta-analysis was done using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 from Cochrane Training and the final output was presented by a forest plot.

RESULTS

The results showed a significant effectiveness of PAL; notably, there was a standardised mean difference of 1.26 with a confidence interval of 0.58-1.94. The Cochran's Q test showed a 5% level of significance as measured by Chi = 449.46. Besides, the results of the I test were significant (98%); moreover, a z value of 3.65 validated the effectiveness of PAL.

CONCLUSION

This research has shown that PAL can be used as a valuable learning tool in the medical field. Educational interventions in curricula for incorporating PAL strategies can potentially enhance the learning experience of the medical students.

摘要

目的

尽管同伴辅助学习(PAL)很受欢迎,但现有文献尚未充分证明其对学生主动学习的影响。本荟萃分析旨在定量分析PAL在医学教育中的有效性。

方法

我们使用医学主题词(MeSH)“同伴辅助”“学习”“主动学习”“教学策略”“同伴辅导”和“同伴指导”在选定数据库中检索采用前后设计的全文英语研究。按照系统方案,我们选择了11篇文章进行最终分析。使用Cochrane培训的Review Manager(RevMan)5.3进行荟萃分析,最终结果以森林图呈现。

结果

结果显示PAL具有显著有效性;值得注意的是,标准化平均差为1.26,置信区间为0.58 - 1.94。Cochran's Q检验显示,以卡方=449.46衡量,显著性水平为5%。此外,I检验结果显著(98%);而且,z值为3.65证实了PAL的有效性。

结论

本研究表明,PAL可作为医学领域一种有价值的学习工具。课程中纳入PAL策略的教育干预可能会提升医学生的学习体验。

相似文献

1
Determining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.确定同伴辅助学习在医学教育中的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 May 30;15(3):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.医学教育中的同伴辅助学习:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Med Educ. 2022 Apr;56(4):365-373. doi: 10.1111/medu.14672. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
"You understand that whole big situation they're in": interpretative phenomenological analysis of peer-assisted learning.“你了解他们所处的整个大环境”:同伴辅助学习的阐释现象学分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 14;18(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1291-2.
5
Peer-assisted Learning (PAL) as an Instructional Tool in Undergraduate Dental Education.同伴辅助学习(PAL)作为本科牙科教育中的一种教学工具。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Nov;30(11):1184-1187. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.11.1184.
6
Experiences of undergraduate nursing students in peer assisted learning in clinical practice: a qualitative systematic review.本科护理专业学生在临床实践中参与同伴辅助学习的经历:一项质性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1190-1219. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003295.
7
Peer-assisted learning: time for nomenclature clarification.同伴辅助学习:是时候澄清术语了。
Med Educ Online. 2016 Jul 12;21:30974. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.30974. eCollection 2016.
8
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
9
"Coaching and Peer-Assisted Learning" (C-PAL) - The mental health nursing student experience: A qualitative evaluation.“辅导与同伴辅助学习”(C-PAL)——精神科护理专业学生的体验:一项质性评估
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Oct;25(8):486-495. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12493. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Do peer-tutors perform better in examinations? An analysis of medical school final examination results.同伴辅导者在考试中表现得更好吗?对医学院期末考试成绩的分析。
Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):698-704. doi: 10.1111/medu.12475.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Peer-assisted learning in medical education: A meta-analysis study.同伴辅助学习在医学教育中的有效性:一项荟萃分析研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0329605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329605. eCollection 2025.
2
A Transition Course to Reverse Empathy Decline in Medical Students.一门扭转医学生共情能力下降的过渡课程。
Clin Teach. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70138. doi: 10.1111/tct.70138.
3
Improving Acute Care Preparedness Amongst Medical Students: A Systematic Review.提高医学生的急性护理准备能力:一项系统综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Peer-assisted learning (PAL): skills lab tutors' experiences and motivation.同伴辅助学习(PAL):技能实验室导师的经验和动机。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1760-2.
2
The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty's knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.教师发展计划在培养教师知识、技能和专业能力方面的影响与效果:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 May;26(4):688-697. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
3
Prognostic significance of circulating microRNA-21 expression in esophageal, pancreatic and colorectal cancers; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 24;17(6):e86688. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86688. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Peer-Assisted Learning in Undergraduate Midwifery Clinical Education: A Qualitative Study on Experiences of Nursing Students From Three Namibian Training Institutions.本科助产临床教育中的同伴辅助学习:对纳米比亚三所培训机构护理专业学生经历的定性研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Apr 3;11:23779608251328286. doi: 10.1177/23779608251328286. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Juxtaposing pedagogical paradigms: the efficacy of peer-assisted learning (PAL) versus faculty-assisted learning (FAL) in the refinement of surgical proficiency.并置教学范式:同伴辅助学习(PAL)与教师辅助学习(FAL)在提高手术熟练度方面的效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06827-2.
6
Enhancing medical English proficiency: the current status and development potential of peer-assisted learning in medical education.提高医学英语水平:医学教育中同伴互助学习的现状与发展潜力
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06492-x.
7
Effectiveness of Peer-Assisted Learning in health professional education: a scoping review of systematic reviews.同伴辅助学习在卫生专业教育中的有效性:系统评价的范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1467. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06434-7.
8
Peer-led versus instructor-led structured debriefing in high-fidelity simulation: a mixed-methods study on teaching effectiveness.同伴引导与讲师引导的高仿真结构化讨论:教学效果的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06262-9.
9
"Between formulas and freestyle" - a qualitative analysis of peer tutor preparation and its impact on peer relations.“在配方和自由式之间”——对同伴导师准备情况及其对同伴关系影响的定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):1173. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06191-7.
10
Empowering the future: improving community wellbeing and health literacy through outreach and service-learning.赋权未来:通过外展和服务学习提高社区福利和健康素养。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1441778. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1441778. eCollection 2024.
循环 microRNA-21 表达在食管、胰腺和结直肠癌中的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
4
Medical Students Teaching Medical Students Surgical Skills: The Benefits of Peer-Assisted Learning.医学生教医学生外科技能:同伴辅助学习的好处。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):1471-1474. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Peer-assisted learning in scenario-based simulation.基于情景模拟的同伴辅助学习。
Med Educ. 2018 May;52(5):557-558. doi: 10.1111/medu.13563. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
6
The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis.跨专业教育在医疗保健中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Mar;34(3):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
Effectiveness Of Horizontal Peer-Assisted Learning In Physical Examination Performance.横向同伴辅助学习在体格检查表现方面的有效性
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):559-565.
8
Medical students can teach communication skills - a mixed methods study of cross-year peer tutoring.医学生可以教授沟通技巧——一项跨年级同伴辅导的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0939-7.
9
Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies.医学领域的“不发表就出局”理念:对原因、后果及补救措施的系统评价
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(6):1562-1567. doi: 10.12669/pjms.326.10490.
10
The Usage of Social Networking Sites by Medical Students for Educational Purposes: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.医学生出于教育目的使用社交网站:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
N Am J Med Sci. 2016 Jul;8(7):268-78. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.187131.