Van Berkum Amy, Oudshoorn Abe, Garnett Anna
Western University, Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf087.
An aging population and increase in the number of older adults experiencing homelessness in North America requires a more effective response to prevent and end older adult homelessness. While there are few research evidence-based policy solutions to preventing older adult homelessness, there are several promising practices that with further analysis could point to quality policy reform. Using the five-level typology by Fitzpatrick et al. (2021. Advancing a five-level typology of homelessness prevention. International Journal on Homelessness, 1(1), 79-97. doi:10.5206/ijoh.2021.1.13341), this discussion paper outlines policy-oriented recommendations at varying levels of prevention: (a) universal, (b) upstream, (c) crisis, (d) emergency, and (e) repeat. Key policy implications include intersectoral collaboration and policy design that seeks to successfully reach functionally zero homelessness by activating policy strategies at each of the five-levels of prevention. Health and housing practitioners play an essential role in policy planning, design, implementation, and evaluation and can participate in and advocate for opportunities to improve services and address older adult homelessness connected to their practice environments. Promoting research that enhances systematic evaluation of the outcomes of older adults through various housing models is critical to driving policy reform-a necessary action to promote a safe, healthy, and opportunistic future for older adults.
北美人口老龄化以及无家可归的老年人数量增加,这就需要做出更有效的应对措施来预防和消除老年人无家可归的现象。虽然几乎没有基于研究证据的政策解决方案来预防老年人无家可归,但有几种很有前景的做法,经过进一步分析可能会指向高质量的政策改革。利用菲茨帕特里克等人(2021年。推进无家可归预防的五级类型学。《国际无家可归杂志》,1(1),79 - 97。doi:10.5206/ijoh.2021.1.13341)提出的五级类型学,本讨论文件概述了不同预防层面的面向政策的建议:(a) 普遍层面、(b) 上游层面、(c) 危机层面、(d) 紧急层面和 (e) 重复层面。关键的政策影响包括部门间合作和政策设计,旨在通过在五个预防层面激活政策策略,成功实现功能性的零无家可归状态。健康和住房从业者在政策规划、设计、实施和评估中发挥着至关重要的作用,可以参与并倡导改善服务的机会,解决与其实践环境相关的老年人无家可归问题。促进通过各种住房模式加强对老年人结果进行系统评估的研究,对于推动政策改革至关重要——这是为老年人促进安全、健康和充满机遇的未来的必要行动。