• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Systems Approach to Homelessness Prevention for Older Adults.一种针对老年人预防无家可归问题的系统方法。
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf087.
2
Intersections of Ageism and Homelessness Among Older Adults: Implications for Policy, Practice, and Research.老年人中的年龄歧视与无家可归现象的交集:对政策、实践和研究的启示。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad088.
3
Accommodation-based interventions for individuals experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, homelessness.针对正在经历或有经历无家可归风险的个人的基于住宿的干预措施。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 18;17(2):e1165. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1165. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Housing and harm reduction: what is the role of harm reduction in addressing homelessness?住房与减少伤害:减少伤害在解决无家可归问题方面扮演什么角色?
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Jul;24(4):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
5
Pathways of Individuals Experiencing Serious Illness While Homeless: An Exploratory 4-Point Typology from the RASCAL-UP Study.无家可归的重症患者就医途径:来自RASCAL-UP研究的探索性四点分类法
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):209-228. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2023.2223772. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
6
Homelessness And Health: Factors, Evidence, Innovations That Work, And Policy Recommendations.无家可归与健康:因素、证据、有效创新和政策建议。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Feb;43(2):164-171. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01049.
7
Predictors of homelessness among vulnerably housed adults in 3 Canadian cities: a prospective cohort study.加拿大3个城市中住房条件脆弱的成年人无家可归的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 3;16(1):1041. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3711-8.
8
Evolving an evidence-based model for homelessness prevention.制定基于循证的预防 homelessness 模型。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1754-1763. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13000. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
A Literature Review of Homelessness and Aging: Suggestions for a Policy and Practice-Relevant Research Agenda.无家可归与老龄化的文献综述:关于与政策和实践相关的研究议程的建议
Can J Aging. 2016 Mar;35(1):28-41. doi: 10.1017/S0714980815000616. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Specialised residential care for older people subject to homelessness: experiences of residents and staff of a new aged care home in Australia.专为无家可归老年人提供的专门居住护理:澳大利亚一家新养老院居民和工作人员的经验。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04791-y.
2
Intersections of Ageism and Homelessness Among Older Adults: Implications for Policy, Practice, and Research.老年人中的年龄歧视与无家可归现象的交集:对政策、实践和研究的启示。
Gerontologist. 2024 May 1;64(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad088.
3
A pilot randomized controlled trial of CAPABLE in permanent supportive housing for formerly homeless adults.一项关于 CAPABLE 方案在永久性支持性住房中对曾经无家可归的成年人的试点随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May;71(5):1587-1594. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18235. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
Aging in the Right Place for Older Adults Experiencing Housing Insecurity: An Environmental Assessment of Temporary Housing Program.为住房不安全的老年人提供合适的居住环境:临时住房计划的环境评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214857.
5
The risk of eviction and the mental health outcomes among the US adults.美国成年人中被驱逐的风险及心理健康结果。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Sep 6;29:101981. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101981. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Factors Associated With Mortality Among Homeless Older Adults in California: The HOPE HOME Study.与加利福尼亚无家可归的老年成年人死亡率相关的因素:HOPE HOME 研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Oct 1;182(10):1052-1060. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3697.
7
Bridging the Gap between Homelessness in Older Adulthood and Elder Abuse: Considerations for an Age-Friendly Shelter System.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 May 4;34(3):391-400. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2021.1973342. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Creating structural community cohesion: Addressing racial equity in older adult homelessness.建立结构性社区凝聚力:解决老年无家可归者中的种族公平问题。
J Prev Interv Community. 2023 Jul-Sep;51(3):192-204. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2021.1930819. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
The Efficacy of the Geriatric Model of Care in Emergency Housing Programs for Homeless Veterans.老年患者护理模式在无家可归退伍军人紧急住房项目中的效果。
Med Care. 2021 Apr 1;59(Suppl 2):S154-S157. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001438.
10
Health and Psychosocial Needs of Older Adults Who Are Experiencing Homelessness Following Hospital Discharge.老年人在出院后面临无家可归时的健康和心理社会需求。
Gerontologist. 2020 May 15;60(4):715-724. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz078.

一种针对老年人预防无家可归问题的系统方法。

A Systems Approach to Homelessness Prevention for Older Adults.

作者信息

Van Berkum Amy, Oudshoorn Abe, Garnett Anna

机构信息

Western University, Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf087.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf087
PMID:39985557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12065400/
Abstract

An aging population and increase in the number of older adults experiencing homelessness in North America requires a more effective response to prevent and end older adult homelessness. While there are few research evidence-based policy solutions to preventing older adult homelessness, there are several promising practices that with further analysis could point to quality policy reform. Using the five-level typology by Fitzpatrick et al. (2021. Advancing a five-level typology of homelessness prevention. International Journal on Homelessness, 1(1), 79-97. doi:10.5206/ijoh.2021.1.13341), this discussion paper outlines policy-oriented recommendations at varying levels of prevention: (a) universal, (b) upstream, (c) crisis, (d) emergency, and (e) repeat. Key policy implications include intersectoral collaboration and policy design that seeks to successfully reach functionally zero homelessness by activating policy strategies at each of the five-levels of prevention. Health and housing practitioners play an essential role in policy planning, design, implementation, and evaluation and can participate in and advocate for opportunities to improve services and address older adult homelessness connected to their practice environments. Promoting research that enhances systematic evaluation of the outcomes of older adults through various housing models is critical to driving policy reform-a necessary action to promote a safe, healthy, and opportunistic future for older adults.

摘要

北美人口老龄化以及无家可归的老年人数量增加,这就需要做出更有效的应对措施来预防和消除老年人无家可归的现象。虽然几乎没有基于研究证据的政策解决方案来预防老年人无家可归,但有几种很有前景的做法,经过进一步分析可能会指向高质量的政策改革。利用菲茨帕特里克等人(2021年。推进无家可归预防的五级类型学。《国际无家可归杂志》,1(1),79 - 97。doi:10.5206/ijoh.2021.1.13341)提出的五级类型学,本讨论文件概述了不同预防层面的面向政策的建议:(a) 普遍层面、(b) 上游层面、(c) 危机层面、(d) 紧急层面和 (e) 重复层面。关键的政策影响包括部门间合作和政策设计,旨在通过在五个预防层面激活政策策略,成功实现功能性的零无家可归状态。健康和住房从业者在政策规划、设计、实施和评估中发挥着至关重要的作用,可以参与并倡导改善服务的机会,解决与其实践环境相关的老年人无家可归问题。促进通过各种住房模式加强对老年人结果进行系统评估的研究,对于推动政策改革至关重要——这是为老年人促进安全、健康和充满机遇的未来的必要行动。