Suppr超能文献

一项关于屋尘螨提取物治疗支气管哮喘的试验。英国胸科学会研究委员会螨过敏小组委员会。

A trial of house dust mite extract in bronchial asthma. Mite Allergy Subcommittee of the Research Committee of the British Thoracic Association.

出版信息

Br J Dis Chest. 1979 Jul;73(3):260-70.

PMID:399857
Abstract

Patients with asthma considered to be due to house dust mite allergy were allocated at random to treatment with (a) increasing weekly injections of house dust mite extract for 18 weeks followed by monthly injections to complete 18 months of treatment; (b) similar injections for 18 weeks followed by placebo injections up to 18 months or (c) placebo injections for 18 months. Fifty-six patients completed at least six months of observation. In patients not on corticosteroids the treated group did a little better than the controls as judged by night asthma scores, discontinuation of bronchodilators and overall blind assessment of the records by a panel of independent physicians. No benefit was apparent by extending treatment from 18 weeks to 18 months. In contrast, patients on corticosteroids given placebo injections did a little better than the treated group. The extract used was stronger than the commercially available preparation and the injections had to be stopped in one-sixth of the patients because of side-effects. The improvement in patients not on corticosteroids in this trial was of doubtful clinical importance.

摘要

被认为因屋尘螨过敏而患哮喘的患者被随机分配接受以下治疗

(a) 每周递增注射屋尘螨提取物,持续18周,之后每月注射直至完成18个月的治疗;(b) 类似注射18周,之后注射安慰剂直至18个月;或(c) 注射安慰剂18个月。56名患者完成了至少6个月的观察。在未使用皮质类固醇的患者中,根据夜间哮喘评分、支气管扩张剂停用情况以及由一组独立医生对记录进行的总体盲法评估判断,治疗组比对照组表现稍好。将治疗从18周延长至18个月未显示出明显益处。相比之下,接受安慰剂注射的使用皮质类固醇的患者比治疗组表现稍好。所使用的提取物比市售制剂效力更强,六分之一的患者因副作用不得不停止注射。该试验中未使用皮质类固醇的患者的改善在临床重要性方面存疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验