Suppr超能文献

CTS5在四项前瞻性、多中心、随机的ABCSG试验中的验证。

Validation of the CTS5 in four prospective, multicenter, randomized ABCSG trials.

作者信息

Wimmer Kerstin, Hlauschek Dominik, Balic Marija, Pfeiler Georg, Greil Richard, Singer Christian F, Halper Stefan, Steger Günther, Suppan Christoph, Gampenrieder Simon Peter, Helfgott Ruth, Egle Daniel, Filipits Martin, Jakesz Raimund, Sölkner Lidija, Fesl Christian, Gnant Michael, Fitzal Florian

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Breast. 2025 Apr;80:104415. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104415. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) is a clinicopathological tool designed to estimate late distant recurrence (LDR) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). While intended as a prognostic algorithm, its predictive value for ET extension remains uncertain.

METHODS

The score was calculated in 4931 patients from four prospective randomized ABCSG trials (ABCSG-6, -6a, -8, and -16) with 250 LDR events. We assessed its prognostic power, calibration accuracy, and predictive value. Time to LDR was analyzed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In our cohorts, the CTS5 provided prognostic information whether used as a continuous or categorical score. In the ABCSG-8 cohort (n = 2054) and the combined ABCSG-6+8 cohort (n = 3308), a higher continuous score was significantly associated with increased LDR risk. The categorical CTS5 showed that high-risk patients had significantly higher LDR rates compared to low- or intermediate-risk patients. The score slightly overestimated LDR risk, regardless of predicted risk. Although no significant predictive value was found on the relative scale, an absolute LDR risk reduction of 23.4 % was found in patients with a high CTS5 of 5 when extended ET was administered additional five than two years. In patients with a CTS5 of 2, no benefit was found when ET was extended to 10 instead of 7 years.

CONCLUSION

The CTS5 is a valid tool for LDR risk stratification in HR + breast cancer, but should be used cautiously for determining benefits from ET extension, as no significant predictive value was found.

摘要

背景

5年后临床治疗评分(CTS5)是一种临床病理工具,旨在评估激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌患者在接受5年辅助内分泌治疗(ET)后的晚期远处复发(LDR)情况。虽然它是作为一种预后算法设计的,但其对ET延长治疗的预测价值仍不确定。

方法

对来自四项前瞻性随机ABCSG试验(ABCSG-6、-6a、-8和-16)的4931例患者计算该评分,其中有250例发生LDR事件。我们评估了其预后能力、校准准确性和预测价值。使用Cox回归模型分析LDR时间。

结果

在我们的队列中,CTS5无论是作为连续评分还是分类评分,都能提供预后信息。在ABCSG-8队列(n = 2054)和联合的ABCSG-6+8队列(n = 3308)中,较高的连续评分与LDR风险增加显著相关。分类CTS5显示,高危患者的LDR率显著高于低危或中危患者。无论预测风险如何,该评分都略微高估了LDR风险。虽然在相对尺度上未发现显著的预测价值,但当延长ET治疗5年而非2年时,CTS5评分为5的高危患者的绝对LDR风险降低了23.4%。在CTS5评分为2的患者中,将ET延长至10年而非7年未发现益处。

结论

CTS5是HR+乳腺癌LDR风险分层的有效工具,但在确定ET延长治疗的益处时应谨慎使用,因为未发现显著的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1865/11904565/ddaeef6b9c10/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验