Wang Honghong, Qin Ziqi, Li Yixuan, Duan Yuqiong, Lu Qiaoyue, Xiao Xueling
Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 3;27:e65268. doi: 10.2196/65268.
BACKGROUND: People living with HIV/AIDS face multiple challenges that collectively impede their adaptation outcomes. These outcomes include quality of life (QoL), acceptance of illness, mental health (including symptoms of anxiety and depression), and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. While existing evidence addresses specific challenges, it often overlooks the interactions among the various problems people living with HIV/AIDS encounter. The comprehensive-task disease management framework and positive self-management framework provide a theoretical basis for understanding the adaptation process. A culturally tailored, theory-based intervention may be necessary and effective in facilitating better adaptation outcomes for people living with HIV/AIDS. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a hybrid intervention called AiCare (Adaptation intervention with Comprehensive-task disease management framework to achieve renormal life) on improving QoL, acceptance of illness, mental health (anxiety and depression), and ART adherence among people living with HIV/AIDS in China. METHODS: We conducted a 2-arm randomized controlled trial, recruiting 92 people living with HIV/AIDS from an HIV clinic in Hunan, China. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group (receiving standard care) or the intervention group (receiving AiCare in addition to standard care). All analyses were performed from an intention-to-treat perspective. Sociodemographic and HIV-specific clinical characteristics, along with key adaptation outcomes-including QoL, acceptance of illness, mental health (anxiety and depression), and ART adherence-were assessed at baseline (T0), post intervention (T1), and 3 months post intervention (T2). We used generalized estimating equation models and difference-in-difference analysis to evaluate the interventions' effects. RESULTS: The difference-in-difference model showed that at T1, the intervention group experienced significant improvements compared to the control group. QoL increased by 6.35 (95% CI 2.62-10.93, P=.001), acceptance of illness improved by 4.49 (95% CI 2.29-6.68, P<.001), and anxiety decreased by 2.15 (95% CI 1.19-3.11; P=.01). At T2, the intervention group's improvement in QoL was not statistically significant (β 3.62, 95% CI -1.53 to 8.77; P=.17). However, acceptance of illness remained significantly improved by 3.65 (95% CI 1.22-6.08; P=.003), and anxiety decreased by 1.58 (95% CI 0.42-2.74; P=.007). No significant changes were observed in depression or ART adherence between the intervention and control groups. Feedback regarding the AiCare program indicated its acceptability and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The AiCare program demonstrated promising effects in improving disease adaptation outcomes among people living with HIV/AIDS, notably in enhancing QoL, fostering acceptance of illness, and mitigating anxiety symptoms. These findings underscore the hybrid program's potential clinical utility to facilitate the adaptation of people living with HIV/AIDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400087255; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=220729.
背景:艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者面临多种挑战,这些挑战共同阻碍了他们的适应结果。这些结果包括生活质量(QoL)、对疾病的接受度、心理健康(包括焦虑和抑郁症状)以及抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)依从性。虽然现有证据阐述了具体挑战,但往往忽视了艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者所遇到的各种问题之间的相互作用。综合任务疾病管理框架和积极自我管理框架为理解适应过程提供了理论基础。一种根据文化定制的、基于理论的干预措施可能对于促进艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者实现更好的适应结果是必要且有效的。 目的:本研究旨在评估一种名为“爱关怀”(AiCare,即采用综合任务疾病管理框架的适应干预以实现正常生活)的混合干预措施对改善中国艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者的生活质量、对疾病的接受度、心理健康(焦虑和抑郁)以及ART依从性的效果。 方法:我们进行了一项双臂随机对照试验,从中国湖南的一家艾滋病诊所招募了92名艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到对照组(接受标准护理)或干预组(除标准护理外还接受“爱关怀”干预)。所有分析均从意向性治疗的角度进行。在基线(T0)、干预后(T1)和干预后3个月(T2)评估社会人口统计学和艾滋病病毒特异性临床特征,以及关键的适应结果,包括生活质量、对疾病的接受度、心理健康(焦虑和抑郁)以及ART依从性。我们使用广义估计方程模型和双重差分分析来评估干预措施的效果。 结果:双重差分模型显示,在T1时,与对照组相比,干预组有显著改善。生活质量提高了6.35(95%置信区间2.62 - 10.93,P = 0.001),对疾病的接受度提高了4.49(95%置信区间2.29 - 6.68,P < 0.001),焦虑降低了2.15(95%置信区间1.19 - 3.11;P = 0.01)。在T2时,干预组生活质量的改善无统计学意义(β 3.62,95%置信区间 - 1.53至8.77;P = 0.17)。然而,对疾病的接受度仍显著提高了3.65(95%置信区间1.22 - 6.08;P = 0.003),焦虑降低了1.58(95%置信区间0.42 - 2.74;P = 0.007)。干预组和对照组之间在抑郁或ART依从性方面未观察到显著变化。关于“爱关怀”项目的反馈表明其可接受性和可行性。 结论:“爱关怀”项目在改善艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者的疾病适应结果方面显示出有前景的效果,特别是在提高生活质量、促进对疾病的接受度以及减轻焦虑症状方面。这些发现强调了该混合项目在促进艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者适应方面的潜在临床效用。 试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2400087255;https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=220729
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019-7-22
J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-14
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023-6-28