Huang Haitao, Zhang Xiaona, Tu Ling, Zhang Liao, Chen Hong
Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, PR China.
School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, PR China.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Jan;161:104916. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104916. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
People living with HIV often face challenges related to quality of life, mental health, and social support. Nurse-led self-care interventions have been proposed as a means to address these issues, but their overall effectiveness needs systematic evaluation.
To systematically review and meta-analyze the effectiveness of nurse-led self-care interventions on quality of life, social support, depression, and anxiety among people living with HIV.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science (Core Collection), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and PsycINFO (Ovid) was conducted for articles from inception to May 2024. Two authors independently screened studies and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of nurse-led self-care interventions on the quality of life, social support, depression, and anxiety in people living with HIV, published in English, were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata17, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
Nineteen randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2024 were included. The meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, nurse-led self-care interventions significantly improved quality of life (SMD = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.07 to 0.84, P < 0.05) and reduced depression (SMD = -0.46, 95 % CI: -0.75 to -0.17, P < 0.001; RR = 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.94, P < 0.05). The impact on social support was not statistically significant (SMD = -0.02, 95 % CI: -0.25 to 0.22, P = 0.89). Only two studies reported beneficial effects on anxiety, indicating a need for further high-quality research.
Nurse-led self-care interventions effectively improve the quality of life and reduce depression in people living with HIV, but current evidence shows these interventions have little impact on social support. The evidence regarding anxiety is limited, indicating a need for more rigorous research to explore the potential benefits of these interventions for anxiety in people living with HIV. These findings support the inclusion of nurse-led self-care interventions in routine HIV care to enhance the well-being of people living with HIV.
(PROSPERO): CRD42024548592.
感染艾滋病毒的人常常面临与生活质量、心理健康和社会支持相关的挑战。由护士主导的自我护理干预措施被提议作为解决这些问题的一种方式,但其总体效果需要系统评估。
系统评价并荟萃分析由护士主导的自我护理干预措施对感染艾滋病毒者的生活质量、社会支持、抑郁和焦虑的效果。
对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
对PubMed、EMBASE、科学引文索引(核心合集)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、Scopus和PsycINFO(Ovid)进行系统检索,以获取从创刊至2024年5月的文章。两名作者独立筛选研究并提取数据。纳入以英文发表的、调查由护士主导的自我护理干预措施对感染艾滋病毒者的生活质量、社会支持、抑郁和焦虑影响的随机对照试验。使用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量。使用Review Manager 5.3和Stata17进行荟萃分析,并使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法对证据的确定性进行评级。
纳入了2003年至2024年发表的19项随机对照试验。荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,由护士主导的自我护理干预措施显著改善了生活质量(标准化均数差=0.45,95%可信区间:0.07至0.84,P<0.05)并减轻了抑郁(标准化均数差=-0.46,95%可信区间:-0.75至-0.17,P<0.001;风险比=0.80,95%可信区间:0.68至0.94,P<0.05)。对社会支持的影响无统计学意义(标准化均数差=-0.02,95%可信区间:-0.25至0.22,P=0.89)。只有两项研究报告了对焦虑有有益影响,这表明需要进一步开展高质量研究。
由护士主导的自我护理干预措施有效改善了感染艾滋病毒者的生活质量并减轻了抑郁,但目前的证据表明这些干预措施对社会支持影响不大。关于焦虑的证据有限,这表明需要进行更严谨的研究以探索这些干预措施对感染艾滋病毒者焦虑的潜在益处。这些研究结果支持将由护士主导的自我护理干预措施纳入常规艾滋病毒护理,以提高感染艾滋病毒者的福祉。
(PROSPERO):CRD42024548592。