Zhang Cui, Wang Qingbo, Li Chenglong, Jing Zixuan, Zhao Xinyu, Chen Yang, Li Zefu
Department of Neurosurgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong, China.
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 7;16:1502408. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1502408. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of using coil embolization via radial artery access, combined with drilling and drainage, as a minimally invasive treatment for acute epidural hematoma compared to traditional craniotomy.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 134 patients with acute epidural hematoma treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, between January 2020 and April 2023. Among these patients, 37 underwent embolization of the middle meningeal artery through radial artery access combined with burr hole drainage, while 97 patients underwent craniotomy for hematoma removal. The 37 patients treated with embolization were designated as the experimental group, while the remaining 97 patients formed the control group. General patient characteristics, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores upon admission and discharge were recorded and compared between the two groups.
In comparison to the control group, the experimental group exhibited higher rates of postoperative hematoma residuals and longer average postoperative drainage times. Nevertheless, the experimental group demonstrated several advantages including shorter operation durations, reduced intraoperative bleeding, lower rates of postoperative rebleeding and complications, as well as decreased requirements for postoperative blood transfusions and transfusion volumes.
The surgical approach involving coil embolization via radial artery access combined with minimally invasive burr hole drainage yields favorable clinical outcomes. This technique presents as a viable treatment option for acute epidural hematoma resulting from middle meningeal artery hemorrhage.
本研究旨在评估经桡动脉途径进行弹簧圈栓塞联合钻孔引流作为急性硬膜外血肿微创治疗方法与传统开颅手术相比的临床疗效。
对2020年1月至2023年4月在滨州医学院附属医院神经外科接受治疗的134例急性硬膜外血肿患者进行回顾性分析。其中,37例通过桡动脉途径进行脑膜中动脉栓塞联合钻孔引流,97例患者接受开颅血肿清除术。将37例接受栓塞治疗的患者指定为实验组,其余97例患者作为对照组。记录并比较两组患者的一般特征、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症以及入院和出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分。
与对照组相比,实验组术后血肿残留率较高,术后平均引流时间较长。然而,实验组显示出几个优点,包括手术时间较短、术中出血减少、术后再出血和并发症发生率较低,以及术后输血需求和输血量减少。
经桡动脉途径弹簧圈栓塞联合微创钻孔引流的手术方法产生了良好的临床效果。该技术是治疗脑膜中动脉出血导致的急性硬膜外血肿的可行治疗选择。