Spota Andrea, Granieri Stefano, Hassanpour Amir, Shlomovitz Eran, Al-Sukhni Eisar
Department of Surgery, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 10 Eaton North, Room 216, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, Italy.
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):481-491. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02128-x. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
Pre-operative risk assessment tools and frailty scores are increasingly common due to the growing number of elderly, comorbid and frail patients. This study aims to assess the performance of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC (American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program- Surgical Risk Calculator) and the 5mFI (5-items modified Frailty Index) in predicting clinical outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis admitted at our tertiary care center from 2018 to 2023. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, and accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI in predicting any complication, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), need for readmission and supported discharge (30-day follow-up). Among 365/642 patients who underwent surgery, the 5mFI showed poor discrimination for all outcomes but good overall accuracy in the prediction of a supported discharge. In 198 operated patients with available data for the ACS-NSQIP-SRC, it underestimated complications and need for readmission while overestimated the need for supported discharge. There was no concordance between predicted and observed LOS. Among 277/642 patients undergoing non-operative management, 2/3 were frail or mild frail and had a predicted rate of any unfavorable outcome after surgery between 0 and 20%, being 95% above the average risk of each outcome. Mortality couldn't be studied because no death was reported. ACS-NSQIP-SRC and 5mFI performance in predicting outcomes after emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was poor. In the emergency cholecystectomy setting, the ACS-NSQIP-SRC may be less informative, and the 5mFI may be excessively simplistic by neglecting the multidimensional nature of frailty.
由于老年、合并症患者及身体虚弱患者数量不断增加,术前风险评估工具和虚弱评分越来越普遍。本研究旨在评估美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划-手术风险计算器(ACS-NSQIP-SRC)和5项修正虚弱指数(5mFI)在预测急诊胆囊切除术后临床结局方面的表现。这是一项对2018年至2023年在我们三级医疗中心住院的急性结石性胆囊炎患者进行的回顾性队列研究。我们评估了ACS-NSQIP-SRC和5mFI在预测任何并发症、死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、再次入院需求和支持出院(30天随访)方面的区分度、校准度和准确性。在接受手术的365/642例患者中,5mFI对所有结局的区分度较差,但在预测支持出院方面总体准确性良好。在198例有ACS-NSQIP-SRC可用数据的手术患者中,它低估了并发症和再次入院需求,同时高估了支持出院的需求。预测的和观察到的住院时间之间没有一致性。在接受非手术治疗的277/642例患者中,2/3身体虚弱或轻度虚弱,术后任何不良结局的预测发生率在0%至20%之间,比每个结局的平均风险高95%。由于未报告死亡病例,无法研究死亡率。ACS-NSQIP-SRC和5mFI在预测急性胆囊炎急诊胆囊切除术后结局方面表现不佳。在急诊胆囊切除的情况下,ACS-NSQIP-SRC提供的信息可能较少,而5mFI可能因忽视虚弱的多维度性质而过于简单。