Prestedge Jacqueline, Kaufman Claire, Williamson Deborah A
Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21894-2.
Point-of-care testing (PoCT) is an increasingly important diagnostic tool in the healthcare system for accessible pathology testing in hospital, primary care, and community care settings. Clear regulation and governance models are important to ensure quality of PoCT results for patient care.
This review aimed to identify existing regulation and guidelines for management of PoCT and how this has been implemented within Australian healthcare services. We conducted a search of academic publications in PubMed and grey literature (national, state, and independent organisations) and other publicly available information from internet searches for governance of PoCT in Australia. Relevant data from these sources were extracted and narratively synthesised.
Forty-seven sources (17 studies from PubMed, 30 grey literature) were included in the final review. Of the grey literature sources, fifteen current PoCT governance documents comprising of six standards, five guidelines and four frameworks at the international, national and jurisdictional level were included with an increasing number of grey literature sources since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The seventeen included research articles were categorised according to implementation barriers and facilitators with the themes of workforce, clinical governance, PoCT workflow, and cost. An understanding of the clinical and cultural context for PoCT was the most frequently reported facilitator of PoCT, while the most frequently reported barrier was related to inadequate data management.
This review demonstrated limited and inconsistent sources on regulatory and governance models for implementing and managing PoCT in Australia. Identified PoCT programs showcased diverse implementation and governance models to support quality PoCT, with few reporting formal accreditation. Streamlined, practical regulation and governance for PoCT may increase adoption across healthcare settings while ensuring quality results and meeting the needs of patients and healthcare practitioners.
即时检验(PoCT)在医疗保健系统中是一种日益重要的诊断工具,可在医院、初级保健和社区护理环境中进行便捷的病理学检测。清晰的监管和治理模式对于确保即时检验结果用于患者护理的质量至关重要。
本综述旨在确定即时检验管理的现有法规和指南,以及其在澳大利亚医疗服务中的实施情况。我们检索了PubMed上的学术出版物、灰色文献(国家、州和独立组织)以及通过互联网搜索获得的关于澳大利亚即时检验治理的其他公开可用信息。从这些来源提取相关数据并进行叙述性综合分析。
最终综述纳入了47个来源(17项来自PubMed的研究,30份灰色文献)。在灰色文献来源中,包括了15份当前的即时检验治理文件,这些文件由国际、国家和辖区层面的六个标准、五个指南和四个框架组成,自2020年新冠疫情爆发以来,灰色文献来源的数量不断增加。纳入的17篇研究文章根据实施障碍和促进因素进行了分类,主题包括劳动力、临床治理、即时检验工作流程和成本。对即时检验的临床和文化背景的理解是最常被报道的即时检验促进因素,而最常被报道的障碍与数据管理不足有关。
本综述表明,在澳大利亚,用于实施和管理即时检验的监管和治理模式的来源有限且不一致。已确定的即时检验项目展示了多样的实施和治理模式以支持高质量的即时检验,很少有报告进行正式认证。简化、实用的即时检验监管和治理可能会增加其在各医疗环境中的采用率,同时确保质量结果并满足患者和医疗从业者的需求。