• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对用于安全移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的区块链集成的可用性因素、模型和框架的系统评价。

Systematic Review of Usability Factors, Models, and Frameworks with Blockchain Integration for Secure Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications.

作者信息

Feroz Irum, Ahmad Nadeem

机构信息

Department of School of Arts and Creative Technologies, University of Bolton, Bolton, United Kingdom.

Department of Computing and Technology, Iqra University, H-9 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Blockchain Healthc Today. 2024 Dec 16;7. doi: 10.30953/bhty.v7.357. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.30953/bhty.v7.357
PMID:39995486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11848842/
Abstract

This systematic review examines critical usability factors that influence the adoption of mobile health (applications among older adults) and identifies gaps in current usability models, including ISO 9241-11, Nielsen's heuristics, and Panicoideae, Aristidoideae, Chloridoideae, Micrairoideae, Arundinoideae, Danthonioideae. This review also explores the potential role of blockchain technology in enhancing multimodal medical data systems within mHealth applications. A comprehensive search across six databases yielded 1,073 studies, with 60 meeting the inclusion criteria. Studies were analyzed through thematic synthesis to identify key success factors (RQ1) and comparative analysis to assess limitations in existing frameworks (RQ2). Key factors promoting mHealth adoption included ease of use, efficiency, error prevention, learnability, memorability, and user satisfaction. Blockchain integration emerged as a promising approach to improve data security, interoperability, and user trust, particularly for older adults who engage with complex, multimodal health data. Findings from RQ2 highlighted gaps in usability models, such as the lack of age-specific guidance for multimodal interaction, error recovery, and data privacy. These results underscore the need to define a new usability framework and incorporate blockchain to meet the unique needs of older adults in mHealth applications, supporting both secure and accessible healthcare management.

摘要

本系统评价研究了影响老年人采用移动健康(应用程序)的关键可用性因素,并确定了当前可用性模型中的差距,包括ISO 9241-11、尼尔森启发式原则以及黍亚科、三芒草亚科、虎尾草亚科、微穗草亚科、芦竹亚科、扁芒草亚科。本评价还探讨了区块链技术在增强移动健康应用程序中的多模态医疗数据系统方面的潜在作用。对六个数据库进行的全面检索产生了1073项研究,其中60项符合纳入标准。通过主题综合分析来确定关键成功因素(研究问题1),并通过比较分析来评估现有框架中的局限性(研究问题2)。促进移动健康采用的关键因素包括易用性、效率、错误预防、可学习性、可记忆性和用户满意度。区块链集成成为一种有前景的方法,可提高数据安全性、互操作性和用户信任,特别是对于处理复杂多模态健康数据的老年人。研究问题2的结果突出了可用性模型中的差距,例如缺乏针对多模态交互、错误恢复和数据隐私的特定年龄指导。这些结果强调需要定义一个新的可用性框架并纳入区块链,以满足老年人在移动健康应用程序中的独特需求,支持安全且便捷的医疗管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/3fb4fb774fa4/BHTY-7-357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/dc93d1d8bc5a/BHTY-7-357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/ad1d3fe5f98f/BHTY-7-357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/023624c3aee5/BHTY-7-357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/341e09845b0a/BHTY-7-357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/3fb4fb774fa4/BHTY-7-357-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/dc93d1d8bc5a/BHTY-7-357-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/ad1d3fe5f98f/BHTY-7-357-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/023624c3aee5/BHTY-7-357-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/341e09845b0a/BHTY-7-357-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bd/11848842/3fb4fb774fa4/BHTY-7-357-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Review of Usability Factors, Models, and Frameworks with Blockchain Integration for Secure Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications.对用于安全移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的区块链集成的可用性因素、模型和框架的系统评价。
Blockchain Healthc Today. 2024 Dec 16;7. doi: 10.30953/bhty.v7.357. eCollection 2024.
2
Examining Healthcare Practitioners' Perceptions of Virtual Physicians, mHealth Applications, and Barriers to Adoption: Insights for Improving Patient Care and Digital Health Integration.审视医疗从业者对虚拟医生、移动健康应用程序的看法以及采用障碍:改善患者护理和数字健康整合的见解
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Apr 1;18:1865-1885. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S515448. eCollection 2025.
3
Enhancing privacy in mHealth Applications: A User-Centric model identifying key factors influencing Privacy-Related behaviours.增强移动健康应用中的隐私保护:一种以用户为中心的模型,识别影响隐私相关行为的关键因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jul;199:105907. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105907. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
4
Barriers to the Utilization of mHealth Applications in Saudi Arabia: Insights from Patients with Chronic Diseases.沙特阿拉伯移动健康应用使用的障碍:来自慢性病患者的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;13(6):665. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060665.
5
Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review.评估可穿戴设备及其配套移动健康应用程序所使用的属性、方法和框架:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Apr 5;12:e52179. doi: 10.2196/52179.
6
Understanding User Requirements for a Senior-Friendly Mobile Health Application.了解老年人友好型移动健康应用程序的用户需求。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Oct 1;7(5):110. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7050110.
7
Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US).老龄化障碍影响老年人使用移动健康的可用性:基于文献的框架(MOLD-US)。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
Heuristics used for evaluating the usability of mobile health applications: A systematic literature review.用于评估移动健康应用程序可用性的启发式方法:一项系统文献综述。
Digit Health. 2024 May 15;10:20552076241253539. doi: 10.1177/20552076241253539. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
User Control of Personal mHealth Data Using a Mobile Blockchain App: Design Science Perspective.用户使用移动区块链应用程序控制个人健康数据:设计科学视角。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 20;10(1):e32104. doi: 10.2196/32104.
10
End Users' Perspectives on the Quality and Design of mHealth Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines: Qualitative Study.菲律宾新冠疫情期间终端用户对移动健康技术质量与设计的看法:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 20;7:e41838. doi: 10.2196/41838.

本文引用的文献

1
A scope of mobile health solutions in COVID-19 pandemics.新冠疫情中移动健康解决方案的范围。
Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;23:100558. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100558. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
2
User-Centered Design Process of an mHealth App for Health Professionals: Case Study.面向健康专业人员的移动医疗应用的以用户为中心的设计流程:案例研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 26;9(3):e18079. doi: 10.2196/18079.
3
Design Considerations for Mobile Health Applications Targeting Older Adults.面向老年人的移动健康应用程序的设计考虑因素。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):1-8. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200485.
4
Comparison of Older and Younger Adults' Attitudes Toward the Adoption and Use of Activity Trackers.老年人和年轻人对采用和使用活动追踪器的态度比较。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 22;8(10):e18312. doi: 10.2196/18312.
5
Rapid implementation of mobile technology for real-time epidemiology of COVID-19.快速实施移动技术以实时进行 COVID-19 流行病学研究。
Science. 2020 Jun 19;368(6497):1362-1367. doi: 10.1126/science.abc0473. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Willingness, perceived barriers and motivators in adopting mobile applications for health-related interventions among older adults: a scoping review protocol.采用移动应用程序进行健康干预措施的老年人意愿、感知障碍和动机:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 16;10(3):e033870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033870.
7
A Research on the Classification and Applicability of the Mobile Health Applications.移动健康应用程序的分类与适用性研究
J Pers Med. 2020 Feb 27;10(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jpm10010011.
8
Usability Challenges for Health and Wellness Mobile Apps: Mixed-Methods Study Among mHealth Experts and Consumers.健康与健身移动应用程序的可用性挑战:移动健康专家和消费者的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 30;7(1):e12160. doi: 10.2196/12160.
9
A multi-level usability evaluation of mobile health applications: A case study.移动医疗应用程序的多层次可用性评估:案例研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Oct;86:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
Criteria for assessing the quality of mHealth apps: a systematic review.评估移动医疗应用程序质量的标准:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1089-1098. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy050.