• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过协作式试题生成培养临床推理与临床判断能力

Developing Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment Competency Through Collaborative Exam Generation.

作者信息

Von Visger Tania T, Gill Amarjot S, Seo Young Sik, Mann Catherine M

机构信息

Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York (Dr Von Visger, Mr Gill, and Dr Mann); and Department of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology, The State University of New York at Buffalo School of Education, Buffalo, New York (Dr Seo).

出版信息

Nurse Educ. 2025;50(4):E213-E218. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001833. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001833
PMID:39999089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing promotes competency-based education (CBE) to foster learning, producing competent graduates. Effective CBE necessitates innovative teaching strategies to optimize academic performance.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to initiate early clinical reasoning and clinical judgment competency development while enhancing the academic performance and engagement of undergraduate nursing students through collaborative learning and digital engagement strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective academic records review of nursing students in the undergraduate program enrolled in fall 2023 and spring 2024 in an online statistic course.

RESULTS

Ninety-six student records were included in the review. Student engagement predicted academic success as measured by collaborative exam generation ( r = .50, p < .001), time spent in course content ( B = 5.22, SE  = 1.55, t = 3.34, p = .001), and student discussion posts ( B = 7.22, SE  = 1.42, t = 5.11, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Active, collaborative learning approaches can be introduced in nursing prerequisite courses to develop competency in critical reasoning, clinical judgment, and respectful communication strategies to build interprofessional partnerships.

摘要

背景

美国护理学院协会推行基于能力的教育(CBE),以促进学习,培养合格的毕业生。有效的CBE需要创新的教学策略来优化学业表现。

目的

本研究的目的是通过协作学习和数字参与策略,在提高本科护理专业学生学业表现和参与度的同时,启动早期临床推理和临床判断能力的培养。

方法

我们对2023年秋季和2024年春季参加在线统计课程的本科护理专业学生的学术记录进行了回顾性审查。

结果

96份学生记录纳入审查。学生参与度可预测学业成功,具体指标包括协作式考试生成(r = 0.50,p < 0.001)、在课程内容上花费的时间(B = 5.22,标准误 = 1.55,t = 3.34,p = 0.001)以及学生讨论帖数量(B = 7.22,标准误 = 1.42,t = 5.11,p < 0.001)。

结论

可在护理预科课程中引入积极的协作学习方法,以培养批判性推理、临床判断能力以及尊重性沟通策略方面的能力,从而建立跨专业伙伴关系。

相似文献

1
Developing Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment Competency Through Collaborative Exam Generation.通过协作式试题生成培养临床推理与临床判断能力
Nurse Educ. 2025;50(4):E213-E218. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001833. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
SimZones Approach to a Competency-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
Nurse Educ. 2025;50(4):173-178. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001829. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
The use and impact of game-based learning on the learning experience and knowledge retention of nursing undergraduate students: A systematic literature review.基于游戏的学习在护理本科生学习体验和知识保留中的应用和影响:系统文献回顾。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Oct;117:105484. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105484. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
Facilitating problem-based learning among undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative systematic review.促进本科护理专业学生基于问题的学习:一项质性系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students' critical thinking through problem-based learning.一项关于通过基于问题的学习培养护生批判性思维的选定证据的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Aug;28(6):657-663. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
6
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students' clinical reasoning-related skills: A systematic review.高保真模拟对本科护生临床推理相关技能的有效性:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105679. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
The use of structured debate as a teaching strategy among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.结构化辩论在本科护理专业学生中作为一种教学策略的应用:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104766. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104766. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Strategies used for the promotion of critical thinking in nursing undergraduate education: A systematic review.护理本科教育中促进批判性思维的策略:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Oct;57:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review.本科护理专业学生学术素养的重要性及其与未来专业临床实践的关系:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
10
Transforming dental education: interactive and student-centered learning with team-based learning in the undergraduate program.变革牙科教育:本科课程中基于团队学习的互动式和以学生为中心的学习
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;12:1579237. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1579237. eCollection 2025.